서브메뉴
검색
Status and the Psyche: How Mental Health Paradoxes Challenge Theories of Inequality- [electronic resource]
Status and the Psyche: How Mental Health Paradoxes Challenge Theories of Inequality- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101515
- ISBN
- 9798379962098
- DDC
- 301
- 서명/저자
- Status and the Psyche: How Mental Health Paradoxes Challenge Theories of Inequality - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : Indiana University., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(302 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Perry, Brea L. .
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Social scientists have documented a set of unexpected sociodemographic patterns they call health paradoxes or epidemiological paradoxes. Like all paradoxes, such findings compel scholars to reconsider their assumptions about the social world-findings are only "paradoxical" when viewed from a certain perspective. This dissertation centers on mental health paradoxes, cases in which persons deemed low-status (less educated individuals, racial minorities, immigrants) report better mental health despite greater marginalization. I examine three paradoxes: (1) elevated rates of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) in socioeconomically advantaged college students, (2) greater risk of psychiatric disorders in White vs. Black Americans (the Black-White mental health paradox), and (3) higher rates of mental health problems among the native-born (the healthy immigrant paradox). For each paradox, I test a range of potential mechanisms including social support, stressors, and identity measures. I leverage data from two national studies: the Healthy Minds Study (HMS) of college and university students (2009-2019) and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III, 2012-2013). Findings challenge the distributive paradigm inherent in dominant approaches such as the stress process model and fundamental cause theory, both of which are limited by a similar focus on material and psychosocial "resources." Taken together, my results highlight the resilience of groups deemed low-status and suggest that structural and cultural arrangements imposed by high-status groups (including an individualist focus on success and self-advancement) may harm well-being.
- 일반주제명
- Sociology.
- 일반주제명
- Mental health.
- 일반주제명
- Social psychology.
- 키워드
- Stress process
- 키워드
- Suicide
- 키워드
- Paradoxes
- 기타저자
- Indiana University Sociology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02B.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016933989
■00520240214101515
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798379962098
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30568904
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a301
■1001 ▼aColeman, Max E. .▼0(orcid)0000-0002-7419-9329
■24510▼aStatus and the Psyche: How Mental Health Paradoxes Challenge Theories of Inequality▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bIndiana University. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(302 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Perry, Brea L. .
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aSocial scientists have documented a set of unexpected sociodemographic patterns they call health paradoxes or epidemiological paradoxes. Like all paradoxes, such findings compel scholars to reconsider their assumptions about the social world-findings are only "paradoxical" when viewed from a certain perspective. This dissertation centers on mental health paradoxes, cases in which persons deemed low-status (less educated individuals, racial minorities, immigrants) report better mental health despite greater marginalization. I examine three paradoxes: (1) elevated rates of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) in socioeconomically advantaged college students, (2) greater risk of psychiatric disorders in White vs. Black Americans (the Black-White mental health paradox), and (3) higher rates of mental health problems among the native-born (the healthy immigrant paradox). For each paradox, I test a range of potential mechanisms including social support, stressors, and identity measures. I leverage data from two national studies: the Healthy Minds Study (HMS) of college and university students (2009-2019) and the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III, 2012-2013). Findings challenge the distributive paradigm inherent in dominant approaches such as the stress process model and fundamental cause theory, both of which are limited by a similar focus on material and psychosocial "resources." Taken together, my results highlight the resilience of groups deemed low-status and suggest that structural and cultural arrangements imposed by high-status groups (including an individualist focus on success and self-advancement) may harm well-being.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0093.
■650 4▼aSociology.
■650 4▼aMental health.
■650 4▼aSocial psychology.
■653 ▼aHealth inequalities
■653 ▼aSocial psychology
■653 ▼aStress process
■653 ▼aSuicide
■653 ▼aParadoxes
■690 ▼a0626
■690 ▼a0347
■690 ▼a0451
■71020▼aIndiana University▼bSociology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-02B.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0093
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16933989▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
