서브메뉴
검색
Misperceived Norms About Diversity and Inclusion- [electronic resource]
![Misperceived Norms About Diversity and Inclusion - [electronic resource]](/Users/Baul/Images/book.png)
Misperceived Norms About Diversity and Inclusion- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101252
- ISBN
- 9798379728595
- DDC
- 301.1
- 저자명
- Isenberg, Naomi.
- 서명/저자
- Misperceived Norms About Diversity and Inclusion - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : The University of Wisconsin - Madison., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(93 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Brauer, Markus.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Normative attitudes about diversity and inclusion that individuals perceive from their peers are highly consequential for how one interacts with outgroup members. Norms signal what behavior is appropriate in a given situation. Therefore, it is important that these norms represent support for diversity and inclusion. But what is the general public's attitude about diversity and inclusion, and do individuals form accurate perceptions of their peers' attitudes? When people form inaccurate perceptions of their peers' attitudes, this is known as pluralistic ignorance. In five studies, I found that Americans tend to misperceive their peers' attitudes about diversity and inclusion, specifically underestimating how many Americans support diversity and inclusion. I also identify potential causes of this pluralistic ignorance (i.e., demographic characteristics and media use, habits, and beliefs), what the potential consequences are for intergroup behavior that result from this pluralistic ignorance (i.e., self-silencing and intentions to engage in inclusion), and whether correcting this pluralistic ignorance by presenting individuals with accurate information about Americans' support for diversity and inclusion results in greater support for diversity and inclusive behavior. I further provide evidence to rule out a potential alternative explanation for the pluralistic ignorance observed in the pilot study, which is that Americans tend to estimate high support for any position presented to them about their fellow Americans. The results from these five studies contribute to the field's understanding of how prejudice and discrimination persist in society and provide a new direction for the study of how to improve intergroup relations.
- 일반주제명
- Social psychology.
- 일반주제명
- Behavioral psychology.
- 일반주제명
- Social research.
- 키워드
- Diversity
- 키워드
- Inclusion
- 키워드
- Social norms
- 기타저자
- The University of Wisconsin - Madison Psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 84-12A.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016933489
■00520240214101252
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798379728595
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30529868
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a301.1
■1001 ▼aIsenberg, Naomi.
■24510▼aMisperceived Norms About Diversity and Inclusion▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bThe University of Wisconsin - Madison. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(93 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Brauer, Markus.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aNormative attitudes about diversity and inclusion that individuals perceive from their peers are highly consequential for how one interacts with outgroup members. Norms signal what behavior is appropriate in a given situation. Therefore, it is important that these norms represent support for diversity and inclusion. But what is the general public's attitude about diversity and inclusion, and do individuals form accurate perceptions of their peers' attitudes? When people form inaccurate perceptions of their peers' attitudes, this is known as pluralistic ignorance. In five studies, I found that Americans tend to misperceive their peers' attitudes about diversity and inclusion, specifically underestimating how many Americans support diversity and inclusion. I also identify potential causes of this pluralistic ignorance (i.e., demographic characteristics and media use, habits, and beliefs), what the potential consequences are for intergroup behavior that result from this pluralistic ignorance (i.e., self-silencing and intentions to engage in inclusion), and whether correcting this pluralistic ignorance by presenting individuals with accurate information about Americans' support for diversity and inclusion results in greater support for diversity and inclusive behavior. I further provide evidence to rule out a potential alternative explanation for the pluralistic ignorance observed in the pilot study, which is that Americans tend to estimate high support for any position presented to them about their fellow Americans. The results from these five studies contribute to the field's understanding of how prejudice and discrimination persist in society and provide a new direction for the study of how to improve intergroup relations.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0262.
■650 4▼aSocial psychology.
■650 4▼aBehavioral psychology.
■650 4▼aSocial research.
■653 ▼aDiversity
■653 ▼aInclusion
■653 ▼aIntergroup attitudes
■653 ▼aIntergroup behavior
■653 ▼aPluralistic ignorance
■653 ▼aSocial norms
■690 ▼a0451
■690 ▼a0344
■690 ▼a0384
■71020▼aThe University of Wisconsin - Madison▼bPsychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g84-12A.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0262
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16933489▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
