서브메뉴
검색
Agree, Disagree, Agree: Spatial Agency Bias in Online Survey Instrument Design- [electronic resource]
Agree, Disagree, Agree: Spatial Agency Bias in Online Survey Instrument Design- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101145
- ISBN
- 9798380135504
- DDC
- 020
- 서명/저자
- Agree, Disagree, Agree: Spatial Agency Bias in Online Survey Instrument Design - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(206 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Hughes-Hassell, Sandra.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Self-administered, online survey and questionnaire instruments are ubiquitous in research. They are highly visual and involve spatial information processing in addition to the cognition involved in response formulation. Despite its wide use, the linguistic focus of survey research is still largely oriented to Eurocolonial and English-speaking contexts. There is evidence that the writing direction of a person's language produces an effect on the processing and execution of spatial tasks. This is referred to as spatial agency bias. For readers of right-to-left (RTL) languages, such as Arabic, Persian, and Urdu, this spatial agency bias means that we can expect to see an effect in directionally-dependent visuo-spatial or visuo-motor tasks. Online questionnaire and survey instruments are developed for and by left-to-right (LTR) language readers. Given an increasingly diverse, diasporatic global population, it is important to consider how research methods developed within one linguistic context affect data quality when used in more diverse populations. This dissertation takes an experimental approach to explore the relationships between unconscious bias and other effects produced by an interaction between writing system direction and response scale direction in self-administered, online questionnaire instruments. Three experiments attempt to identify any interaction between two independent variables: 1) writing system direction for questionnaire response language) and 2) response scale category order (direction) on three dependent variables: 1) score on scale items, 2) duration of time spent in instrument, and 3) trust in the questionnaire interface. Participants are Arabic or English speakers responding to an instrument presented in one of these two languages. The analysis found no interaction effect between the independent variables on either trust or time on response, but did find a significant interaction effect on mean scale score for horizontal response scale items. This study has implications for multilingual, international, and cross-cultural survey and questionnaire design. This work contributes to efforts to incorporate more diverse populations in research through better understanding how language context affects data collection.
- 일반주제명
- Information science.
- 일반주제명
- Quantitative psychology.
- 일반주제명
- Cognitive psychology.
- 일반주제명
- Linguistics.
- 키워드
- Arabic
- 키워드
- Bilingual
- 키워드
- Positioning bias
- 키워드
- Research methods
- 기타저자
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Information and Library Science
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02B.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016932963
■00520240214101145
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380135504
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30522422
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a020
■1001 ▼aMartin, John D., III.
■24510▼aAgree, Disagree, Agree: Spatial Agency Bias in Online Survey Instrument Design▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(206 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Hughes-Hassell, Sandra.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aSelf-administered, online survey and questionnaire instruments are ubiquitous in research. They are highly visual and involve spatial information processing in addition to the cognition involved in response formulation. Despite its wide use, the linguistic focus of survey research is still largely oriented to Eurocolonial and English-speaking contexts. There is evidence that the writing direction of a person's language produces an effect on the processing and execution of spatial tasks. This is referred to as spatial agency bias. For readers of right-to-left (RTL) languages, such as Arabic, Persian, and Urdu, this spatial agency bias means that we can expect to see an effect in directionally-dependent visuo-spatial or visuo-motor tasks. Online questionnaire and survey instruments are developed for and by left-to-right (LTR) language readers. Given an increasingly diverse, diasporatic global population, it is important to consider how research methods developed within one linguistic context affect data quality when used in more diverse populations. This dissertation takes an experimental approach to explore the relationships between unconscious bias and other effects produced by an interaction between writing system direction and response scale direction in self-administered, online questionnaire instruments. Three experiments attempt to identify any interaction between two independent variables: 1) writing system direction for questionnaire response language) and 2) response scale category order (direction) on three dependent variables: 1) score on scale items, 2) duration of time spent in instrument, and 3) trust in the questionnaire interface. Participants are Arabic or English speakers responding to an instrument presented in one of these two languages. The analysis found no interaction effect between the independent variables on either trust or time on response, but did find a significant interaction effect on mean scale score for horizontal response scale items. This study has implications for multilingual, international, and cross-cultural survey and questionnaire design. This work contributes to efforts to incorporate more diverse populations in research through better understanding how language context affects data collection.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0153.
■650 4▼aInformation science.
■650 4▼aQuantitative psychology.
■650 4▼aCognitive psychology.
■650 4▼aLinguistics.
■653 ▼aArabic
■653 ▼aBilingual
■653 ▼aPositioning bias
■653 ▼aResearch methods
■653 ▼aSpatial agency bias
■690 ▼a0723
■690 ▼a0632
■690 ▼a0633
■690 ▼a0290
■71020▼aThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill▼bInformation and Library Science.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-02B.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0153
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16932963▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024


