본문

서브메뉴

Planning 'Just' Public Space: Reimagining Hostile Designs Through Do-It-Yourself Urban Design Tactics by Unhoused Communities in Los Angeles- [electronic resource]
Planning 'Just' Public Space: Reimagining Hostile Designs Through Do-It-Yourself Urban Des...
Planning 'Just' Public Space: Reimagining Hostile Designs Through Do-It-Yourself Urban Design Tactics by Unhoused Communities in Los Angeles- [electronic resource]

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문파일 국외
최종처리일시  
20240214101156
ISBN  
9798379597207
DDC  
307
저자명  
Giamarino, Christopher Daniel.
서명/저자  
Planning Just Public Space: Reimagining Hostile Designs Through Do-It-Yourself Urban Design Tactics by Unhoused Communities in Los Angeles - [electronic resource]
발행사항  
[S.l.]: : University of California, Los Angeles., 2023
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
형태사항  
1 online resource(318 p.)
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2023.
사용제한주기  
This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
초록/해제  
요약In this dissertation, I explore the expansion of hostile designs as conceptualized zones of anti-homelessness and the production of do-it-yourself urban design interventions as tactical responses (i.e., community infrastructure and mutual aid services)-employing mapping, photography, and conversations with unhoused residents in Los Angeles. Historically, scholars have investigated the criminalization of homelessness, achieved through the enforcement of anti-homeless ordinances and the spatial banishment of unhoused individuals. Less study has gone to hostile regulations and spatial design conditions in shelter spaces and public spaces that shrink the capabilities of unhoused individuals to access bare necessities, partake in life-sustaining activities, and realize socio-spatial rights to the city and its public spaces. To intervene in this gap, I review an emerging suite of strategies-quality-of-life ordinances, spatial policing, and hostile soft and hard design controls-that exist across Los Angeles' anti-homeless landscape. Across four neighborhoods, I interviewed 36 unhoused individuals to understand their experiences with anti-homeless zones and responses to hostile designs within shelters and in public spaces. Additionally, I catalogued the grassroots construction of residential and community infrastructure by unhoused individuals. My key argument is that hostile designs encourage and, ultimately, criminalize and demolish DIY urban design interventions that seek to respond to conditions of homelessness. Hostile designs across shelters and public spaces shrink the socio-spatial rights of unhoused residents to access public spaces and realize capabilities allowing them to partake in life-sustaining activities. I advance the concept of "dwellable inhabitance," which is a capability afforded through regulation and urban design that allows individuals to appropriate public space so that they can partake in life-sustaining activities when no accessible or reasonable alternatives exist. Here, I critique the processes and outcomes of hostile designs that reproduce homelessness, as experienced by unhoused residents and their DIY urban design responses. Then, grounded in the recommendations and demands of unhoused residents, I suggest how hostile designs can be transformed into just public space designs. My suggested policy and design recommendations follow an inclusive justice framework that addresses distributive, procedural, interactional, and recognitional aspects of justice, as well as care and repair considerations. Instead of fencing off parks, closing public restrooms, and criminalizing non-criminal activities like sleeping, cooking, or hanging out, I advocate for the abolition of hostile designs and recommend that city planners and urban designers should accommodate DIY urban design interventions to render public spaces in LA more socially, politically, and spatially accessible places that provide compassionate services and opportunities for housing. 
일반주제명  
Urban planning.
일반주제명  
Geography.
키워드  
DIY urban design
키워드  
Homelessness
키워드  
Los Angeles
키워드  
Public space
키워드  
Revanchism
키워드  
Spatial justice
기타저자  
University of California, Los Angeles Urban Planning 0911
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 84-12A.
기본자료저록  
Dissertation Abstract International
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008240612s2023      us  |||||||||||||||c||eng  d
■001000016933045
■00520240214101156
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798379597207
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30524067
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a307
■1001  ▼aGiamarino,  Christopher  Daniel.
■24510▼aPlanning  'Just'  Public  Space:  Reimagining  Hostile  Designs  Through  Do-It-Yourself  Urban  Design  Tactics  by  Unhoused  Communities  in  Los  Angeles▼h[electronic  resource]
■260    ▼a[S.l.]:▼bUniversity  of  California,  Los  Angeles.  ▼c2023
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor  :▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses,  ▼c2023
■300    ▼a1  online  resource(318  p.)
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  84-12,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Loukaitou-Sideris,  Anastasia.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  2023.
■506    ▼aThis  item  must  not  be  sold  to  any  third  party  vendors.
■520    ▼aIn  this  dissertation,  I  explore  the  expansion  of  hostile  designs  as  conceptualized  zones  of  anti-homelessness  and  the  production  of  do-it-yourself  urban  design  interventions  as  tactical  responses  (i.e.,  community  infrastructure  and  mutual  aid  services)-employing  mapping,  photography,  and  conversations  with  unhoused  residents  in  Los  Angeles.  Historically,  scholars  have  investigated  the  criminalization  of  homelessness,  achieved  through  the  enforcement  of  anti-homeless  ordinances  and  the  spatial  banishment  of  unhoused  individuals.  Less  study  has  gone  to  hostile  regulations  and  spatial  design  conditions  in  shelter  spaces  and  public  spaces  that  shrink  the  capabilities  of  unhoused  individuals  to  access  bare  necessities,  partake  in  life-sustaining  activities,  and  realize  socio-spatial  rights  to  the  city  and  its  public  spaces.  To  intervene  in  this  gap,  I  review  an  emerging  suite  of  strategies-quality-of-life  ordinances,  spatial  policing,  and  hostile  soft  and  hard  design  controls-that  exist  across  Los  Angeles'  anti-homeless  landscape.  Across  four  neighborhoods,  I  interviewed  36  unhoused  individuals  to  understand  their  experiences  with  anti-homeless  zones  and  responses  to  hostile  designs  within  shelters  and  in  public  spaces.  Additionally,  I  catalogued  the  grassroots  construction  of  residential  and  community  infrastructure  by  unhoused  individuals.  My  key  argument  is  that  hostile  designs  encourage  and,  ultimately,  criminalize  and  demolish  DIY  urban  design  interventions  that  seek  to  respond  to  conditions  of  homelessness.  Hostile  designs  across  shelters  and  public  spaces  shrink  the  socio-spatial  rights  of  unhoused  residents  to  access  public  spaces  and  realize  capabilities  allowing  them  to  partake  in  life-sustaining  activities.  I  advance  the  concept  of  "dwellable  inhabitance,"  which  is  a  capability  afforded  through  regulation  and  urban  design  that  allows  individuals  to  appropriate  public  space  so  that  they  can  partake  in  life-sustaining  activities  when  no  accessible  or  reasonable  alternatives  exist.  Here,  I  critique  the  processes  and  outcomes  of  hostile  designs  that  reproduce  homelessness,  as  experienced  by  unhoused  residents  and  their  DIY  urban  design  responses.  Then,  grounded  in  the  recommendations  and  demands  of  unhoused  residents,  I  suggest  how  hostile  designs  can  be  transformed  into  just  public  space  designs.  My  suggested  policy  and  design  recommendations  follow  an  inclusive  justice  framework  that  addresses  distributive,  procedural,  interactional,  and  recognitional  aspects  of  justice,  as  well  as  care  and  repair  considerations.  Instead  of  fencing  off  parks,  closing  public  restrooms,  and  criminalizing  non-criminal  activities  like  sleeping,  cooking,  or  hanging  out,  I  advocate  for  the  abolition  of  hostile  designs  and  recommend  that  city  planners  and  urban  designers  should  accommodate  DIY  urban  design  interventions  to  render  public  spaces  in  LA  more  socially,  politically,  and  spatially  accessible  places  that  provide  compassionate  services  and  opportunities  for  housing. 
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0031.
■650  4▼aUrban  planning.
■650  4▼aGeography.
■653    ▼aDIY  urban  design
■653    ▼aHomelessness
■653    ▼aLos  Angeles
■653    ▼aPublic  space
■653    ▼aRevanchism
■653    ▼aSpatial  justice
■690    ▼a0999
■690    ▼a0366
■690    ▼a0729
■71020▼aUniversity  of  California,  Los  Angeles▼bUrban  Planning  0911.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g84-12A.
■773    ▼tDissertation  Abstract  International
■790    ▼a0031
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2023
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16933045▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.
■980    ▼a202402▼f2024

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF08103 전자도서 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.