서브메뉴
검색
Kingship in the Everyday: Experiencing Royal Authority in the Middle Kingdom- [electronic resource]
Kingship in the Everyday: Experiencing Royal Authority in the Middle Kingdom- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101236
- ISBN
- 9798380143455
- DDC
- 571
- 서명/저자
- Kingship in the Everyday: Experiencing Royal Authority in the Middle Kingdom - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : The University of Chicago., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(322 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Moeller, Nadine;Osborne, James.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약The goal of this study, broadly speaking, is to better understand how Middle Kingdom (ca. 2055-1650 BCE) kingship worked from a non-royal perspective. Egyptological scholarship has traditionally taken for granted both that Egyptian kings were omnipresent in ancient Egyptian society, and that the intricacies of kingship were restricted to royal and elite circles. This contradiction between expected omnipresence and simultaneous restriction is most often explained through the concept of "decorum," which as applied in Egyptology proposes that royal symbols and the image of the king were confined to the royal sphere. This is a reductive approach that removes the agency of those outside the royal circle. Instead, this dissertation prioritizes non-royal agency in engagement with kingship.The dissertation's main argument is constructed from two separate but related parts: first, kingship was not omnipresent; second, kingship was still relevant and present in non-royal society in specific context-dependent ways. The simultaneous omnipresence and restrictedness of kingship can be differently explained if one considers the relevance that kingship had to nonroyal Egyptians in different circumstances. In highlighting relevance, this study makes an argument that restrictedness is not necessarily an imposition from above, but that it may also be a choice for something else by non-royals. This argument was developed based on evidence from settlement contexts in Egypt (Chapter 3), royal, divine, and elite monuments and rituals (Chapter 4), and funerary practice (Chapter 5). Rather than simply a critique of decorum, this study proposes an opposing explanation for the role of kingship in broader ancient Egyptian society that takes into account the agency and priorities of different actors, rather than just the king.This study can be thought of as a bottom-up exploration of kingship, one framed by and contextualized in methodologies employed in the archaeologies of empire and sovereignty. The primary way in which Egyptology has approached interactions with kingship in the past-as a largely uniform engagement conditioned by strict decorum-has gotten in the way of our proper understanding of both kingship itself, as well as how it fit into broader Egyptian society. Kingship cannot be said to not have been important. But based on the evidence discussed in this study, it also cannot be said that the king or kingship were always overarching concerns. The ways in which kingship was engaged with by different parts of the population could differ dramatically, and previous models used to explain non-royal engagement with kingship have obfuscated that variability. Kingship in the Middle Kingdom was not monolithic: it was not experienced in the same way by all Egyptians, and it was more relevant and invoked by some more than others.
- 일반주제명
- Archaeology.
- 일반주제명
- Ancient history.
- 일반주제명
- Near Eastern studies.
- 키워드
- Non-royal agency
- 키워드
- Decorum
- 키워드
- Egypt
- 키워드
- kingship
- 키워드
- Middle Kingdom
- 기타저자
- The University of Chicago Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02A.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016933355
■00520240214101236
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380143455
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30527988
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a571
■1001 ▼aOsorio Guimaraes Da Silva, Luiza.▼0(orcid)0000-0003-1848-3445
■24510▼aKingship in the Everyday: Experiencing Royal Authority in the Middle Kingdom▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bThe University of Chicago. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(322 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Moeller, Nadine;Osborne, James.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aThe goal of this study, broadly speaking, is to better understand how Middle Kingdom (ca. 2055-1650 BCE) kingship worked from a non-royal perspective. Egyptological scholarship has traditionally taken for granted both that Egyptian kings were omnipresent in ancient Egyptian society, and that the intricacies of kingship were restricted to royal and elite circles. This contradiction between expected omnipresence and simultaneous restriction is most often explained through the concept of "decorum," which as applied in Egyptology proposes that royal symbols and the image of the king were confined to the royal sphere. This is a reductive approach that removes the agency of those outside the royal circle. Instead, this dissertation prioritizes non-royal agency in engagement with kingship.The dissertation's main argument is constructed from two separate but related parts: first, kingship was not omnipresent; second, kingship was still relevant and present in non-royal society in specific context-dependent ways. The simultaneous omnipresence and restrictedness of kingship can be differently explained if one considers the relevance that kingship had to nonroyal Egyptians in different circumstances. In highlighting relevance, this study makes an argument that restrictedness is not necessarily an imposition from above, but that it may also be a choice for something else by non-royals. This argument was developed based on evidence from settlement contexts in Egypt (Chapter 3), royal, divine, and elite monuments and rituals (Chapter 4), and funerary practice (Chapter 5). Rather than simply a critique of decorum, this study proposes an opposing explanation for the role of kingship in broader ancient Egyptian society that takes into account the agency and priorities of different actors, rather than just the king.This study can be thought of as a bottom-up exploration of kingship, one framed by and contextualized in methodologies employed in the archaeologies of empire and sovereignty. The primary way in which Egyptology has approached interactions with kingship in the past-as a largely uniform engagement conditioned by strict decorum-has gotten in the way of our proper understanding of both kingship itself, as well as how it fit into broader Egyptian society. Kingship cannot be said to not have been important. But based on the evidence discussed in this study, it also cannot be said that the king or kingship were always overarching concerns. The ways in which kingship was engaged with by different parts of the population could differ dramatically, and previous models used to explain non-royal engagement with kingship have obfuscated that variability. Kingship in the Middle Kingdom was not monolithic: it was not experienced in the same way by all Egyptians, and it was more relevant and invoked by some more than others.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0330.
■650 4▼aArchaeology.
■650 4▼aAncient history.
■650 4▼aNear Eastern studies.
■653 ▼aNon-royal agency
■653 ▼aDecorum
■653 ▼aEgypt
■653 ▼akingship
■653 ▼aMiddle Kingdom
■653 ▼aPolitical experience
■690 ▼a0324
■690 ▼a0579
■690 ▼a0559
■71020▼aThe University of Chicago▼bNear Eastern Languages and Civilizations.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-02A.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0330
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16933355▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
