Couples' Forgiveness and Reconciliation a Dyadic, Longitudinal Investigation of Couples' Diaries- [electronic resource]
Couples' Forgiveness and Reconciliation a Dyadic, Longitudinal Investigation of Couples' Diaries- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101657
- ISBN
- 9798380114707
- DDC
- 384
- 저자명
- Kloeber, Dayna.
- 서명/저자
- Couples Forgiveness and Reconciliation a Dyadic, Longitudinal Investigation of Couples Diaries - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : Arizona State University., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(146 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Adame, Elissa A.;Alberts, Jess K.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약The purpose of this study was to understand more about how romantic couples negotiate forgiveness and reconciliation. To do so, this study used purposive sampling and recruited 21 couples (42 individuals) to independently complete diaries two times a week for four weeks. In addition to collecting information about the transgression and background related to the transgression, participants were asked to report their most recent conversations with their partner since their last diary. Analysis revealed that couples' conversations were triggered in the following seven ways: Intentional repair, during other conversation, during other arguments, airing feelings, everyday interactions, potential for temptation or risk, and chronic behavior associated with violation. This interpretive analysis was also guided by negotiating morality theory. One of the central assumptions of negotiated morality theory is that forgiveness communication is an important site for relational partners to negotiate a shared sense of morality. Moreover, the details of couple's diaries and conversations provide information that can be used to advance negotiated morality theory. Specifically, this analysis extends theory by 1) demonstrating that conceptualizing the moral functions of forgiving communication hierarchically, renaming constructs, and the addition of a new construct (honoring emotion) will improve its parsimony and explanatory power, 2) illustrating how couples engage in discussion-based forgiveness and reconciliation, and 3) empirically illustrating how defining moral standards and restoring relational justice are the two main moral functions of forgiving communication. Restoring relational justice consisted of the following subthemes: establishing accountability, atonement, honoring the self and other, honoring emotion, and increasing safety and certainty. Among the contributions this analysis makes is identifying and describing honoring emotion. In doing so, the subcategories of honoring emotion provide both heuristic and practical implications. Participants' diaries provided insights about the range of emotions, the discomfort and difficulty of emotional conversations, and communicating emotions.
- 일반주제명
- Communication.
- 일반주제명
- Counseling psychology.
- 일반주제명
- Psychology.
- 키워드
- Couples
- 키워드
- Dyadic
- 키워드
- Forgiveness
- 키워드
- Reconciliation
- 기타저자
- Arizona State University Communication Studies
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02B.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016934820
■00520240214101657
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380114707
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30635159
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a384
■1001 ▼aKloeber, Dayna.
■24510▼aCouples' Forgiveness and Reconciliation a Dyadic, Longitudinal Investigation of Couples' Diaries▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bArizona State University. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(146 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Adame, Elissa A.;Alberts, Jess K.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aThe purpose of this study was to understand more about how romantic couples negotiate forgiveness and reconciliation. To do so, this study used purposive sampling and recruited 21 couples (42 individuals) to independently complete diaries two times a week for four weeks. In addition to collecting information about the transgression and background related to the transgression, participants were asked to report their most recent conversations with their partner since their last diary. Analysis revealed that couples' conversations were triggered in the following seven ways: Intentional repair, during other conversation, during other arguments, airing feelings, everyday interactions, potential for temptation or risk, and chronic behavior associated with violation. This interpretive analysis was also guided by negotiating morality theory. One of the central assumptions of negotiated morality theory is that forgiveness communication is an important site for relational partners to negotiate a shared sense of morality. Moreover, the details of couple's diaries and conversations provide information that can be used to advance negotiated morality theory. Specifically, this analysis extends theory by 1) demonstrating that conceptualizing the moral functions of forgiving communication hierarchically, renaming constructs, and the addition of a new construct (honoring emotion) will improve its parsimony and explanatory power, 2) illustrating how couples engage in discussion-based forgiveness and reconciliation, and 3) empirically illustrating how defining moral standards and restoring relational justice are the two main moral functions of forgiving communication. Restoring relational justice consisted of the following subthemes: establishing accountability, atonement, honoring the self and other, honoring emotion, and increasing safety and certainty. Among the contributions this analysis makes is identifying and describing honoring emotion. In doing so, the subcategories of honoring emotion provide both heuristic and practical implications. Participants' diaries provided insights about the range of emotions, the discomfort and difficulty of emotional conversations, and communicating emotions.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0010.
■650 4▼aCommunication.
■650 4▼aCounseling psychology.
■650 4▼aPsychology.
■653 ▼aCommunicating forgiveness
■653 ▼aCouples
■653 ▼aDyadic
■653 ▼aForgiveness
■653 ▼aNegotiated morality theory
■653 ▼aReconciliation
■690 ▼a0459
■690 ▼a0603
■690 ▼a0621
■71020▼aArizona State University▼bCommunication Studies.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-02B.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0010
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16934820▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
