서브메뉴
검색
The Theory and Typology of Phonological Reordering- [electronic resource]
![The Theory and Typology of Phonological Reordering - [electronic resource]](/Users/Baul/Images/book.png)
The Theory and Typology of Phonological Reordering- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101641
- ISBN
- 9798380619370
- DDC
- 401
- 저자명
- Mooney, Kate.
- 서명/저자
- The Theory and Typology of Phonological Reordering - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : New York University., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(351 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Gouskova, Maria.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약In this thesis, I compare phonological patterns that are fully general across a language (which apply predictably based on sound, without exception) to phonological patterns that bear morphological restrictions. I find that language-general and morphologically-restricted phonology are distinct. The main property I focus on is Order Preservation. While complete reordering of segments is possible in morphologically-restricted patterns (such as infixation and reduplication), I argue that language-general phonology is different. Language-general phonology is Order Preserving: it never fully transposes or reorders sounds. I demonstrate that putative counterexamples are better analyzed as general patterns of gestural lengthening and overlap, where sounds remain partially anchored in their original positions.The empirical focus of the thesis is on three phenomena: metathesis, copy epenthesis, and consonant epenthesis. Through in-depth typological surveys, I uncover persistent asymmetries between language-general and morphologically-restricted versions of these patterns. I propose Lamination Theory, a model of phonology that uses separate representational layers for language-general vs. morphologically-restricted phonology. The typological differences between these two kinds of phonology can thus be traced back to their different representations (following Hall 2003). By contrast, theories that assume representational homogeneity (e.g. Cophonology Theory, indexation theory, and Lexical Phonology) cannot derive these asymmetries.
- 일반주제명
- Linguistics.
- 일반주제명
- Morphology.
- 키워드
- Morphophonology
- 키워드
- Phonetics
- 키워드
- Phonology
- 키워드
- Precedence
- 기타저자
- New York University Linguistics
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-04B.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016934669
■00520240214101641
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380619370
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30632530
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a401
■1001 ▼aMooney, Kate.
■24510▼aThe Theory and Typology of Phonological Reordering▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bNew York University. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(351 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-04, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Gouskova, Maria.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aIn this thesis, I compare phonological patterns that are fully general across a language (which apply predictably based on sound, without exception) to phonological patterns that bear morphological restrictions. I find that language-general and morphologically-restricted phonology are distinct. The main property I focus on is Order Preservation. While complete reordering of segments is possible in morphologically-restricted patterns (such as infixation and reduplication), I argue that language-general phonology is different. Language-general phonology is Order Preserving: it never fully transposes or reorders sounds. I demonstrate that putative counterexamples are better analyzed as general patterns of gestural lengthening and overlap, where sounds remain partially anchored in their original positions.The empirical focus of the thesis is on three phenomena: metathesis, copy epenthesis, and consonant epenthesis. Through in-depth typological surveys, I uncover persistent asymmetries between language-general and morphologically-restricted versions of these patterns. I propose Lamination Theory, a model of phonology that uses separate representational layers for language-general vs. morphologically-restricted phonology. The typological differences between these two kinds of phonology can thus be traced back to their different representations (following Hall 2003). By contrast, theories that assume representational homogeneity (e.g. Cophonology Theory, indexation theory, and Lexical Phonology) cannot derive these asymmetries.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0146.
■650 4▼aLinguistics.
■650 4▼aMorphology.
■653 ▼aMorphophonology
■653 ▼aPhonetics
■653 ▼aPhonology
■653 ▼aPrecedence
■690 ▼a0290
■690 ▼a0287
■71020▼aNew York University▼bLinguistics.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-04B.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0146
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16934669▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
