서브메뉴
검색
Who Is Watching? The Consequences of Foreign Criticism- [electronic resource]
![Who Is Watching? The Consequences of Foreign Criticism - [electronic resource]](/Users/Baul/Images/book.png)
Who Is Watching? The Consequences of Foreign Criticism- [electronic resource]
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문파일 국외
- 최종처리일시
- 20240214101644
- ISBN
- 9798380092159
- DDC
- 320
- 서명/저자
- Who Is Watching? The Consequences of Foreign Criticism - [electronic resource]
- 발행사항
- [S.l.]: : The University of Wisconsin - Madison., 2023
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,, 2023
- 형태사항
- 1 online resource(251 p.)
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Renshon, Jonathan.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.
- 사용제한주기
- This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
- 초록/해제
- 요약What are the consequences of foreign criticism? I challenge the conventional understanding of the "effectiveness" of naming and shaming, which has traditionally been limited to examining the reactions of states targeted by foreign criticism. Instead, I develop a multi-audience theory of shaming which suggests that foreign criticism is a deliberate strategy in which political actors simultaneously communicate messages to the shamed society ("targets"), their constituents back home ("shamers"), and the international community at large ("third-party observers"). My theory posits that by publicly criticizing transgressive governments, state actors can improve their image domestically and internationally despite potential backlash in the target state, but that by reinforcing their moral image they, ironically, increase their public's tolerance for certain domestic abuses. My theory thus sheds light on the puzzling prevalence of shaming as a political strategy even when it evokes a counterproductive `backlash' effect in the shamed country, providing insights into its motives, and intended and unintended consequences.To examine the range of consequences associated with shaming, I investigate the impact of shaming on public opinion in three audiences: targets, shamers, and third-party observers, relying on an unusual combination of large-scale survey experiments fielded in multiple countries and large-n observational analysis. In particular, I conducted experimental surveys in seven democracies with over 29,000 respondents, combining insights from case-specific survey experiments with a meta-analysis in which the experimental design is held constant across multiple countries. Taking seriously concerns of generalizability, effects that I identify through survey experiments are then corroborated with cross-national observational analyses of global trends of government shaming in the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) combined with data collected by the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) and the World Values Survey (WVS). Overall, I show that while shaming can incite a counterproductive backlash effect, it allows shamers to signal their dedication to international norms at home and abroad. Paradoxically, this moral signaling can increase tolerance for certain domestic abuses, which has implications not only for scholars of international relations but also for policymakers who rely on shaming as a prevalent diplomatic tool.
- 일반주제명
- Political science.
- 키워드
- Experiments
- 키워드
- Public opinion
- 기타저자
- The University of Wisconsin - Madison Political Science
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-02A.
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertation Abstract International
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008240612s2023 us |||||||||||||||c||eng d■001000016934699
■00520240214101644
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798380092159
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI30633132
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a320
■1001 ▼aBassan-Nygate, Lotem.
■24510▼aWho Is Watching? The Consequences of Foreign Criticism▼h[electronic resource]
■260 ▼a[S.l.]:▼bThe University of Wisconsin - Madison. ▼c2023
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor :▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, ▼c2023
■300 ▼a1 online resource(251 p.)
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-02, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Renshon, Jonathan.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2023.
■506 ▼aThis item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
■520 ▼aWhat are the consequences of foreign criticism? I challenge the conventional understanding of the "effectiveness" of naming and shaming, which has traditionally been limited to examining the reactions of states targeted by foreign criticism. Instead, I develop a multi-audience theory of shaming which suggests that foreign criticism is a deliberate strategy in which political actors simultaneously communicate messages to the shamed society ("targets"), their constituents back home ("shamers"), and the international community at large ("third-party observers"). My theory posits that by publicly criticizing transgressive governments, state actors can improve their image domestically and internationally despite potential backlash in the target state, but that by reinforcing their moral image they, ironically, increase their public's tolerance for certain domestic abuses. My theory thus sheds light on the puzzling prevalence of shaming as a political strategy even when it evokes a counterproductive `backlash' effect in the shamed country, providing insights into its motives, and intended and unintended consequences.To examine the range of consequences associated with shaming, I investigate the impact of shaming on public opinion in three audiences: targets, shamers, and third-party observers, relying on an unusual combination of large-scale survey experiments fielded in multiple countries and large-n observational analysis. In particular, I conducted experimental surveys in seven democracies with over 29,000 respondents, combining insights from case-specific survey experiments with a meta-analysis in which the experimental design is held constant across multiple countries. Taking seriously concerns of generalizability, effects that I identify through survey experiments are then corroborated with cross-national observational analyses of global trends of government shaming in the UN Universal Periodic Review (UPR) combined with data collected by the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) and the World Values Survey (WVS). Overall, I show that while shaming can incite a counterproductive backlash effect, it allows shamers to signal their dedication to international norms at home and abroad. Paradoxically, this moral signaling can increase tolerance for certain domestic abuses, which has implications not only for scholars of international relations but also for policymakers who rely on shaming as a prevalent diplomatic tool.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0262.
■650 4▼aPolitical science.
■653 ▼aDomestic politics
■653 ▼aExperiments
■653 ▼aNaming and shaming
■653 ▼aPublic opinion
■690 ▼a0601
■690 ▼a0615
■71020▼aThe University of Wisconsin - Madison▼bPolitical Science.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-02A.
■773 ▼tDissertation Abstract International
■790 ▼a0262
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2023
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T16934699▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
■980 ▼a202402▼f2024
