본문

서브메뉴

Epistemologies and Enactments of Self-determination in South Dakota
Epistemologies and Enactments of Self-determination in South Dakota
Epistemologies and Enactments of Self-determination in South Dakota

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211152025
ISBN  
9798383228562
DDC  
379
저자명  
Menter, Abby Marie.
서명/저자  
Epistemologies and Enactments of Self-determination in South Dakota
발행사항  
[Sl] : University of Minnesota, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
292 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Shirazi, Roozbeh;Sumida Huaman, Elizabeth.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약In the State of South Dakota, and across the so-called United States in general, political forces continue to attempt to control Indigenous identity, land relationships, and power, despite the characterization of the current policy era as one of Tribal Self-Determination. This critical ethnographic study examines the ways in which these policies are felt and experienced as acts of coloniality and continued attempts at racial and cultural erasure. Epistemologies of decoloniality, however, serve as sources of resistance to hegemonic state violence. The findings of this study explore the main epistemic frames that educators and other education stakeholders use to situate their opposition to coloniality, thereby creating a vision for self-determination that is distinct from that of the federal government. In this study, three main themes emerged as ways in which educators and education stakeholders epistemically de-link from colonial constructions of Indigenous education, each of which forms a unique pedagogical perspective that guides both theory and practice. These pedagogies, of relationality, of resistance, and of sustenance, act as the ways in which some educators establish counter-hegemonic discourses, practices, and outcomes in their work. 
일반주제명  
Education policy
일반주제명  
Education
일반주제명  
Educational philosophy
일반주제명  
Pedagogy
일반주제명  
Epistemology
일반주제명  
Native studies
키워드  
Coloniality
키워드  
Decoloniality
키워드  
Political forces
키워드  
Education stakeholders
키워드  
Hegemonic state violence
기타저자  
University of Minnesota Organizational Leadership Policy and Development
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-01A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017162550
■00520250211152025
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798383228562
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31333047
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a379
■1001  ▼aMenter,  Abby  Marie.
■24510▼aEpistemologies  and  Enactments  of  Self-determination  in  South  Dakota
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity  of  Minnesota▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a292  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-01,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Shirazi,  Roozbeh;Sumida  Huaman,  Elizabeth.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  Minnesota,  2024.
■520    ▼aIn  the  State  of  South  Dakota,  and  across  the  so-called  United  States  in  general,  political  forces  continue  to  attempt  to  control  Indigenous  identity,  land  relationships,  and  power,  despite  the  characterization  of  the  current  policy  era  as  one  of  Tribal  Self-Determination.  This  critical  ethnographic  study  examines  the  ways  in  which  these  policies  are  felt  and  experienced  as  acts  of  coloniality  and  continued  attempts  at  racial  and  cultural  erasure.  Epistemologies  of  decoloniality,  however,  serve  as  sources  of  resistance  to  hegemonic  state  violence.  The  findings  of  this  study  explore  the  main  epistemic  frames  that  educators  and  other  education  stakeholders  use  to  situate  their  opposition  to  coloniality,  thereby  creating  a  vision  for  self-determination  that  is  distinct  from  that  of  the  federal  government.  In  this  study,  three  main  themes  emerged  as  ways  in  which  educators  and  education  stakeholders  epistemically  de-link  from  colonial  constructions  of  Indigenous  education,  each  of  which  forms  a  unique  pedagogical  perspective  that  guides  both  theory  and  practice.  These  pedagogies,  of  relationality,  of  resistance,  and  of  sustenance,  act  as  the  ways  in  which  some  educators  establish  counter-hegemonic  discourses,  practices,  and  outcomes  in  their  work. 
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0130.
■650  4▼aEducation  policy
■650  4▼aEducation
■650  4▼aEducational  philosophy
■650  4▼aPedagogy
■650  4▼aEpistemology
■650  4▼aNative  studies
■653    ▼aColoniality
■653    ▼aDecoloniality
■653    ▼aPolitical  forces
■653    ▼aEducation  stakeholders
■653    ▼aHegemonic  state  violence
■690    ▼a0458
■690    ▼a0515
■690    ▼a0998
■690    ▼a0741
■690    ▼a0456
■690    ▼a0393
■71020▼aUniversity  of  Minnesota▼bOrganizational  Leadership,  Policy,  and  Development.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-01A.
■790    ▼a0130
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162550▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF09787 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.