본문

서브메뉴

Essays on Free Speech, Legal Reasoning, and the Limits of Morality
Essays on Free Speech, Legal Reasoning, and the Limits of Morality
Essays on Free Speech, Legal Reasoning, and the Limits of Morality

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211152037
ISBN  
9798384466345
DDC  
100
저자명  
Broughton, Gabriel L.
서명/저자  
Essays on Free Speech, Legal Reasoning, and the Limits of Morality
발행사항  
[Sl] : Princeton University, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
129 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-04, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Rosen, Gideon.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Princeton University, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약This dissertation includes three stand-alone papers in value theory, broadly understood. In the first paper, "Supererogation, blame, and paradox," I present a novel argument for the conclusion that moral supererogation is less common than common sense supposes. I then consider how this conclusion might be avoided, raising questions in the process about the relationship between blame and wrongdoing, as well as the distinctive offices of the moral ought and must. In the second paper, "On weakening the plaintiff's case without strengthening the defendant's," I prove a startling result about the leading formal model of common-law precedential constraint: Given a plausible assumption about how certain legal reasons are related, the lauded reason model collapses into the friendless result model, and it does so even in the standard setting in which these models were originally formalized. Finally, in "Refining the argument from democracy," I develop a new version of the democratic argument for the freedom of expression that can give a plausible reply to the perennial objection---ordinarily considered fatal---that such accounts fail to protect lots of deserving nonpolitical speech.
일반주제명  
Philosophy
일반주제명  
Ethics
일반주제명  
Law
일반주제명  
Political science
키워드  
Blame
키워드  
Free speech
키워드  
Legal reasoning
키워드  
Morality
키워드  
Precedent
키워드  
Supererogation
기타저자  
Princeton University Philosophy
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-04A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017162650
■00520250211152037
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798384466345
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31335701
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a100
■1001  ▼aBroughton,  Gabriel  L.▼0(orcid)0000-0002-1846-7624
■24510▼aEssays  on  Free  Speech,  Legal  Reasoning,  and  the  Limits  of  Morality
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bPrinceton  University▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a129  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-04,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Rosen,  Gideon.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--Princeton  University,  2024.
■520    ▼aThis  dissertation  includes  three  stand-alone  papers  in  value  theory,  broadly  understood.  In  the  first  paper,  "Supererogation,  blame,  and  paradox,"  I  present  a  novel  argument  for  the  conclusion  that  moral  supererogation  is  less  common  than  common  sense  supposes.  I  then  consider  how  this  conclusion  might  be  avoided,  raising  questions  in  the  process  about  the  relationship  between  blame  and  wrongdoing,  as  well  as  the  distinctive  offices  of  the  moral  ought  and  must.  In  the  second  paper,  "On  weakening  the  plaintiff's  case  without  strengthening  the  defendant's,"  I  prove  a  startling  result  about  the  leading  formal  model  of  common-law  precedential  constraint:  Given  a  plausible  assumption  about  how  certain  legal  reasons  are  related,  the  lauded  reason  model  collapses  into  the  friendless  result  model,  and  it  does  so  even  in  the  standard  setting  in  which  these  models  were  originally  formalized.  Finally,  in  "Refining  the  argument  from  democracy,"  I  develop  a  new  version  of  the  democratic  argument  for  the  freedom  of  expression  that  can  give  a  plausible  reply  to  the  perennial  objection---ordinarily  considered  fatal---that  such  accounts  fail  to  protect  lots  of  deserving  nonpolitical  speech.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0181.
■650  4▼aPhilosophy
■650  4▼aEthics
■650  4▼aLaw
■650  4▼aPolitical  science
■653    ▼aBlame
■653    ▼aFree  speech
■653    ▼aLegal  reasoning
■653    ▼aMorality
■653    ▼aPrecedent
■653    ▼aSupererogation
■690    ▼a0422
■690    ▼a0394
■690    ▼a0398
■690    ▼a0615
■71020▼aPrinceton  University▼bPhilosophy.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-04A.
■790    ▼a0181
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162650▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF09951 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.