본문

서브메뉴

Counterfactual Closeness: How Some Nonactual Events Appear Closer Than Others
Counterfactual Closeness: How Some Nonactual Events Appear Closer Than Others
Counterfactual Closeness: How Some Nonactual Events Appear Closer Than Others

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211152040
ISBN  
9798384018148
DDC  
150
저자명  
Myers, Matthew.
서명/저자  
Counterfactual Closeness: How Some Nonactual Events Appear Closer Than Others
발행사항  
[Sl] : Northwestern University, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
227 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Rips, Lance.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Northwestern University, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약Some non-actual events feel closer to having happened than others. Our capacity for counter-factual thought-to reason about events not as they were, but as they could have been-helps inform such closeness intuitions. This dissertation seeks to elaborate on the properties of events which make such alternatives appear close. In the following experiments, I examine the influence of lexical items and event properties on counterfactual proximatives (Experiments 1-2), address how knowledge of causal mechanisms guide the plausibility of counterfactual alternatives (Experiments 3-4), and explore how differences in outcome valence may bias counterfactual closeness judgments (Experiment 5-6). The findings from these experiments provide evidence that beliefs about counterfactual closeness are guided by a variety of factors. These factors include (1) the propensity of entities towards a particular outcome, (2) the belief in causal mechanisms which systematically relate causes to their effects, and (3) the frequency of contrastive sets of possibilities. Lastly, I discuss the implication of these findings for current theories of close counterfactuals and future directions of research.
일반주제명  
Psychology
일반주제명  
Personality psychology
일반주제명  
Experimental psychology
일반주제명  
Social psychology
키워드  
Closeness intuitions
키워드  
Counterfactuals
키워드  
Propensity
키워드  
Causal mechanisms
기타저자  
Northwestern University Psychology
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-02B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017162679
■00520250211152040
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798384018148
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31336618
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a150
■1001  ▼aMyers,  Matthew.
■24510▼aCounterfactual  Closeness:  How  Some  Nonactual  Events  Appear  Closer  Than  Others
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bNorthwestern  University▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a227  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-02,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Rips,  Lance.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--Northwestern  University,  2024.
■520    ▼aSome  non-actual  events  feel  closer  to  having  happened  than  others.  Our  capacity  for  counter-factual  thought-to  reason  about  events  not  as  they  were,  but  as  they  could  have  been-helps  inform  such  closeness  intuitions.  This  dissertation  seeks  to  elaborate  on  the  properties  of  events  which  make  such  alternatives  appear  close.  In  the  following  experiments,  I  examine  the  influence  of  lexical  items  and  event  properties  on  counterfactual  proximatives  (Experiments  1-2),  address  how  knowledge  of  causal  mechanisms  guide  the  plausibility  of  counterfactual  alternatives  (Experiments  3-4),  and  explore  how  differences  in  outcome  valence  may  bias  counterfactual  closeness  judgments  (Experiment  5-6).  The  findings  from  these  experiments  provide  evidence  that  beliefs  about  counterfactual  closeness  are  guided  by  a  variety  of  factors.  These  factors  include  (1)  the  propensity  of  entities  towards  a  particular  outcome,  (2)  the  belief  in  causal  mechanisms  which  systematically  relate  causes  to  their  effects,  and  (3)  the  frequency  of  contrastive  sets  of  possibilities.  Lastly,  I  discuss  the  implication  of  these  findings  for  current  theories  of  close  counterfactuals  and  future  directions  of  research.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0163.
■650  4▼aPsychology
■650  4▼aPersonality  psychology
■650  4▼aExperimental  psychology
■650  4▼aSocial  psychology
■653    ▼aCloseness  intuitions
■653    ▼aCounterfactuals
■653    ▼aPropensity
■653    ▼aCausal  mechanisms
■690    ▼a0621
■690    ▼a0625
■690    ▼a0623
■690    ▼a0451
■71020▼aNorthwestern  University▼bPsychology.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-02B.
■790    ▼a0163
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162679▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF09963 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.