서브메뉴
검색
Sources of Bias in Naturalistic Decision Making Under Risk
Sources of Bias in Naturalistic Decision Making Under Risk
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211152737
- ISBN
- 9798384093855
- DDC
- 153
- 저자명
- Qin, Chao.
- 서명/저자
- Sources of Bias in Naturalistic Decision Making Under Risk
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of Washington, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 140 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Joslyn, Susan.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Severe weather situations such as tornadoes and droughts require people to take protective action even when the probability of the severe weather is low because the consequence of not protecting is very serious. In naturalistic decision experiments based on these situations, people are risk-seeking such that they often do not take protective actions when it is economically rational to do so. This project studied this phenomenon from a signal detection theory perspective. A random likelihood model was introduced to estimate the subjective criterion which is the likelihood above which one takes protection actions. This model separates the subjective criterion from subjective likelihood, which is participants' perception of the probability of the weather event. Three experiments manipulated the gain-loss framing and the economically rational criterion (the criterion based on expected value theory) to examine their effect on the subjective criterion. When the gain-loss framing was manipulated, the subjective criterion was higher in a loss frame than a gain frame. When the economically rational criterion was manipulated, the subjective criterion was between the economically rational criterion and the center of the possible likelihood range (50%). Neither manipulation affected subjective likelihood. In addition, participants showed an overestimation in subjective likelihood in all conditions. The shifted subjective criterion overcame this overestimation and resulted in risk-seeking decisions in some conditions. Thus, the random likelihood model analysis suggests that shift of the subjective criterion is the source of risk-seeking decisions in naturalistic decision tasks. Potential interventions are discussed with the aim to improve the placement of the subjective criterion.
- 일반주제명
- Cognitive psychology
- 일반주제명
- Experimental psychology
- 일반주제명
- Behavioral psychology
- 키워드
- Decision making
- 키워드
- Weather forecast
- 기타저자
- University of Washington Psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-03B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017163662
■00520250211152737
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798384093855
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31491524
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a153
■1001 ▼aQin, Chao.
■24510▼aSources of Bias in Naturalistic Decision Making Under Risk
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of Washington▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a140 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Joslyn, Susan.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2024.
■520 ▼aSevere weather situations such as tornadoes and droughts require people to take protective action even when the probability of the severe weather is low because the consequence of not protecting is very serious. In naturalistic decision experiments based on these situations, people are risk-seeking such that they often do not take protective actions when it is economically rational to do so. This project studied this phenomenon from a signal detection theory perspective. A random likelihood model was introduced to estimate the subjective criterion which is the likelihood above which one takes protection actions. This model separates the subjective criterion from subjective likelihood, which is participants' perception of the probability of the weather event. Three experiments manipulated the gain-loss framing and the economically rational criterion (the criterion based on expected value theory) to examine their effect on the subjective criterion. When the gain-loss framing was manipulated, the subjective criterion was higher in a loss frame than a gain frame. When the economically rational criterion was manipulated, the subjective criterion was between the economically rational criterion and the center of the possible likelihood range (50%). Neither manipulation affected subjective likelihood. In addition, participants showed an overestimation in subjective likelihood in all conditions. The shifted subjective criterion overcame this overestimation and resulted in risk-seeking decisions in some conditions. Thus, the random likelihood model analysis suggests that shift of the subjective criterion is the source of risk-seeking decisions in naturalistic decision tasks. Potential interventions are discussed with the aim to improve the placement of the subjective criterion.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0250.
■650 4▼aCognitive psychology
■650 4▼aExperimental psychology
■650 4▼aBehavioral psychology
■653 ▼aDecision making
■653 ▼aWeather forecast
■653 ▼aSignal detection theory
■653 ▼aSubjective criterion
■653 ▼aNaturalistic decision
■690 ▼a0633
■690 ▼a0623
■690 ▼a0384
■71020▼aUniversity of Washington▼bPsychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-03B.
■790 ▼a0250
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17163662▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
