서브메뉴
검색
The Moral Justification of Social Practices and Policies: Agents' Access to Multiple Viewpoints and the Role of Discourse in Inquiry
The Moral Justification of Social Practices and Policies: Agents' Access to Multiple Viewpoints and the Role of Discourse in Inquiry
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211152132
- ISBN
- 9798383626818
- DDC
- 100
- 저자명
- Stroh, Kyle.
- 서명/저자
- The Moral Justification of Social Practices and Policies: Agents Access to Multiple Viewpoints and the Role of Discourse in Inquiry
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Indiana University, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 193 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Baron, Marcia;Schickore, Jutta.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약On what grounds can agents morally criticize the social practices or policies of their own society? Can agents be justified in morally criticizing the social practices or policies found in other societies? When is the moral condemnation of societies' social practices or policies unreasonable? My dissertation aims to address these questions by developing an account of agents' methods of inquiry into the moral status of societies' social practices and/or policies - one which acknowledges the central role of democratic public discourse in agents' inquiries into political matters - that would enable principled distinctions to be drawn between morally reasonable and unreasonable political viewpoints.I claim that acknowledging individuals' access to multiple viewpoints requires deconceptualizing the proceedings of public discourse. Instead of viewing public discourse as a process in which each person presents her own viewpoint to have it either accepted or rejected by the other participants, I argue that this discourse is better able to serve a justificatory role when individuals use this to familiarize themselves with the alternative worldviews of others and critically compare these different options. As a result, the aim of such discourse would be for agents to collaboratively work with others in their society to figure out what worldviews are available to them, what adjustments would be necessary to make each of these worldviews more reasonable, and how to determine when certain worldviews are significantly less reasonable than others that are available to them.
- 일반주제명
- Philosophy
- 일반주제명
- Sociology
- 일반주제명
- Ethics
- 일반주제명
- Political science
- 일반주제명
- Logic
- 키워드
- Public discourse
- 키워드
- Social practices
- 기타저자
- Indiana University Philosophy
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-02A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017163075
■00520250211152132
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798383626818
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31483471
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a100
■1001 ▼aStroh, Kyle.
■24510▼aThe Moral Justification of Social Practices and Policies: Agents' Access to Multiple Viewpoints and the Role of Discourse in Inquiry
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bIndiana University▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a193 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Baron, Marcia;Schickore, Jutta.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2024.
■520 ▼aOn what grounds can agents morally criticize the social practices or policies of their own society? Can agents be justified in morally criticizing the social practices or policies found in other societies? When is the moral condemnation of societies' social practices or policies unreasonable? My dissertation aims to address these questions by developing an account of agents' methods of inquiry into the moral status of societies' social practices and/or policies - one which acknowledges the central role of democratic public discourse in agents' inquiries into political matters - that would enable principled distinctions to be drawn between morally reasonable and unreasonable political viewpoints.I claim that acknowledging individuals' access to multiple viewpoints requires deconceptualizing the proceedings of public discourse. Instead of viewing public discourse as a process in which each person presents her own viewpoint to have it either accepted or rejected by the other participants, I argue that this discourse is better able to serve a justificatory role when individuals use this to familiarize themselves with the alternative worldviews of others and critically compare these different options. As a result, the aim of such discourse would be for agents to collaboratively work with others in their society to figure out what worldviews are available to them, what adjustments would be necessary to make each of these worldviews more reasonable, and how to determine when certain worldviews are significantly less reasonable than others that are available to them.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0093.
■650 4▼aPhilosophy
■650 4▼aSociology
■650 4▼aEthics
■650 4▼aPolitical science
■650 4▼aLogic
■653 ▼aPublic discourse
■653 ▼aMoral justification
■653 ▼aReflective equilibrium
■653 ▼aMultiple viewpoints
■653 ▼aSocial practices
■690 ▼a0422
■690 ▼a0626
■690 ▼a0615
■690 ▼a0394
■690 ▼a0395
■71020▼aIndiana University▼bPhilosophy.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-02A.
■790 ▼a0093
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17163075▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
