서브메뉴
검색
Bureaucracies at War: Using Institutional Grammar and Network Analysis to Examine National Security Decision-Making During Counterinsurgencies
Bureaucracies at War: Using Institutional Grammar and Network Analysis to Examine National Security Decision-Making During Counterinsurgencies
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211151155
- ISBN
- 9798382320359
- DDC
- 320
- 저자명
- Detzi, Daniel W.
- 서명/저자
- Bureaucracies at War: Using Institutional Grammar and Network Analysis to Examine National Security Decision-Making During Counterinsurgencies
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : The University of Arizona, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 176 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Braithwaite, Alex.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약How do the interactions between bureaucratic organizations shape strategic decision-making during counterinsurgencies? Although similar questions about bureaucratic behavior have been explored regarding short term crises, empirical examinations of these interactions during long term conflicts have been less prolific. Yet studying bureaucratic interactions offers an opportunity to better understand the challenges associated with counterinsurgencies. This is especially salient following the U.S. failure in Afghanistan but can also apply to the dynamics of long term conflict in general. By going beyond the focus on bureaucratic politics at the level of elite decision-makers during periods of crisis, this study seeks to explore how the interactions between bureaucratic organizations might affect coordination and cooperation as strategies develop, unfold, and evolve during long, drawn-out conflicts. Using institutional grammar to gather data from formal legislation, as well as from interview transcripts from participants of the counterinsurgency in Afghanistan, this study employs network analysis to examine both formal and informal defense decision-making institutions. The results of this research indicate that bureaucratic organizations form ad hoc networks during counterinsurgencies, which differ from interactions mandated by legislation and presidential directives. Specifically, these ad hoc networks tend to favor trust building measures to facilitate cooperation, especially in the area of strategic assessment where there is a gap in formalized interactions. The findings imply that strategic processes during long term conflicts are incomplete and that collective action problems are addressed through informal interactions rather than through formalized processes.
- 일반주제명
- Political science
- 일반주제명
- Public policy
- 일반주제명
- Public administration
- 키워드
- Decision-making
- 키워드
- Foreign policy
- 키워드
- Network analysis
- 기타저자
- The University of Arizona Government and Public Policy
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-10A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017161055
■00520250211151155
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798382320359
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31236291
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a320
■1001 ▼aDetzi, Daniel W.
■24510▼aBureaucracies at War: Using Institutional Grammar and Network Analysis to Examine National Security Decision-Making During Counterinsurgencies
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bThe University of Arizona▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a176 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Braithwaite, Alex.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2024.
■520 ▼aHow do the interactions between bureaucratic organizations shape strategic decision-making during counterinsurgencies? Although similar questions about bureaucratic behavior have been explored regarding short term crises, empirical examinations of these interactions during long term conflicts have been less prolific. Yet studying bureaucratic interactions offers an opportunity to better understand the challenges associated with counterinsurgencies. This is especially salient following the U.S. failure in Afghanistan but can also apply to the dynamics of long term conflict in general. By going beyond the focus on bureaucratic politics at the level of elite decision-makers during periods of crisis, this study seeks to explore how the interactions between bureaucratic organizations might affect coordination and cooperation as strategies develop, unfold, and evolve during long, drawn-out conflicts. Using institutional grammar to gather data from formal legislation, as well as from interview transcripts from participants of the counterinsurgency in Afghanistan, this study employs network analysis to examine both formal and informal defense decision-making institutions. The results of this research indicate that bureaucratic organizations form ad hoc networks during counterinsurgencies, which differ from interactions mandated by legislation and presidential directives. Specifically, these ad hoc networks tend to favor trust building measures to facilitate cooperation, especially in the area of strategic assessment where there is a gap in formalized interactions. The findings imply that strategic processes during long term conflicts are incomplete and that collective action problems are addressed through informal interactions rather than through formalized processes.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0009.
■650 4▼aPolitical science
■650 4▼aPublic policy
■650 4▼aPublic administration
■653 ▼aBureaucratic organizations
■653 ▼aLong term conflicts
■653 ▼aDecision-making
■653 ▼aForeign policy
■653 ▼aInstitutional analysis
■653 ▼aNetwork analysis
■690 ▼a0615
■690 ▼a0703
■690 ▼a0630
■690 ▼a0601
■690 ▼a0617
■71020▼aThe University of Arizona▼bGovernment and Public Policy.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-10A.
■790 ▼a0009
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17161055▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
