서브메뉴
검색
The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211151126
- ISBN
- 9798382631097
- DDC
- 301.1
- 서명/저자
- The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 128 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Gray, Kurt.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약We often agree that it is wrong to harm others, but what about harming ourselves? Research on self-harm in moral psychology has not kept pace with similar research on dyadic behaviors. Most theoretical frameworks of moral judgments leave self-harms to what is essentially a footnote. Even suicide, the most commonly studied self-harm is not all that common within moral psychology research. In seven studies, we tested how the Theory of Dyadic Morality (Schein & Gray, 2018) explains differences in moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. We found general support for our Dyadic Self-Harm hypothesis where the more others suffer as a result of self-harm, the more immoral the behavior is judged. The extent to which the individual was seen as a victim or other perpetrators were identified corresponded to more lenient judgments. We also show that the more people value of personal autonomy the less immoral they judge self-harm behaviors. This research combined qualitative, correlational, and experimental research methods to further understand how people make moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. Future research is proposed to answer additional questions regarding this relatively unearthed domain.
- 일반주제명
- Social psychology
- 일반주제명
- Personality psychology
- 일반주제명
- Psychology
- 일반주제명
- Neurosciences
- 키워드
- Harming
- 키워드
- Moral judgments
- 키워드
- Immorality
- 키워드
- Suicide
- 기타저자
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-11B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017160853
■00520250211151126
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798382631097
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31147092
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a301.1
■1001 ▼aO'Fallon, Connor.
■24510▼aThe Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a128 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Gray, Kurt.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2024.
■520 ▼aWe often agree that it is wrong to harm others, but what about harming ourselves? Research on self-harm in moral psychology has not kept pace with similar research on dyadic behaviors. Most theoretical frameworks of moral judgments leave self-harms to what is essentially a footnote. Even suicide, the most commonly studied self-harm is not all that common within moral psychology research. In seven studies, we tested how the Theory of Dyadic Morality (Schein & Gray, 2018) explains differences in moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. We found general support for our Dyadic Self-Harm hypothesis where the more others suffer as a result of self-harm, the more immoral the behavior is judged. The extent to which the individual was seen as a victim or other perpetrators were identified corresponded to more lenient judgments. We also show that the more people value of personal autonomy the less immoral they judge self-harm behaviors. This research combined qualitative, correlational, and experimental research methods to further understand how people make moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. Future research is proposed to answer additional questions regarding this relatively unearthed domain.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0153.
■650 4▼aSocial psychology
■650 4▼aPersonality psychology
■650 4▼aPsychology
■650 4▼aNeurosciences
■653 ▼aHarming
■653 ▼aMoral judgments
■653 ▼aImmorality
■653 ▼aSelf-harm behaviors
■653 ▼aSuicide
■690 ▼a0451
■690 ▼a0621
■690 ▼a0625
■690 ▼a0317
■71020▼aThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill▼bPsychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-11B.
■790 ▼a0153
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17160853▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
