본문

서브메뉴

The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone

Detailed Information

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211151126
ISBN  
9798382631097
DDC  
301.1
저자명  
O'Fallon, Connor.
서명/저자  
The Immorality of Self-Harm: When the Self Is Not Alone
발행사항  
[Sl] : The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
128 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Gray, Kurt.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약We often agree that it is wrong to harm others, but what about harming ourselves? Research on self-harm in moral psychology has not kept pace with similar research on dyadic behaviors. Most theoretical frameworks of moral judgments leave self-harms to what is essentially a footnote. Even suicide, the most commonly studied self-harm is not all that common within moral psychology research. In seven studies, we tested how the Theory of Dyadic Morality (Schein & Gray, 2018) explains differences in moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. We found general support for our Dyadic Self-Harm hypothesis where the more others suffer as a result of self-harm, the more immoral the behavior is judged. The extent to which the individual was seen as a victim or other perpetrators were identified corresponded to more lenient judgments. We also show that the more people value of personal autonomy the less immoral they judge self-harm behaviors. This research combined qualitative, correlational, and experimental research methods to further understand how people make moral judgments of self-harm behaviors. Future research is proposed to answer additional questions regarding this relatively unearthed domain.
일반주제명  
Social psychology
일반주제명  
Personality psychology
일반주제명  
Psychology
일반주제명  
Neurosciences
키워드  
Harming
키워드  
Moral judgments
키워드  
Immorality
키워드  
Self-harm behaviors
키워드  
Suicide
기타저자  
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Psychology
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-11B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017160853
■00520250211151126
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798382631097
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31147092
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a301.1
■1001  ▼aO'Fallon,  Connor.
■24510▼aThe  Immorality  of  Self-Harm:  When  the  Self  Is  Not  Alone
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bThe  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Chapel  Hill▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a128  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  85-11,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Gray,  Kurt.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--The  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Chapel  Hill,  2024.
■520    ▼aWe  often  agree  that  it  is  wrong  to  harm  others,  but  what  about  harming  ourselves?  Research  on  self-harm  in  moral  psychology  has  not  kept  pace  with  similar  research  on  dyadic  behaviors.  Most  theoretical  frameworks  of  moral  judgments  leave  self-harms  to  what  is  essentially  a  footnote.  Even  suicide,  the  most  commonly  studied  self-harm  is  not  all  that  common  within  moral  psychology  research.  In  seven  studies,  we  tested  how  the  Theory  of  Dyadic  Morality  (Schein  &  Gray,  2018)  explains  differences  in  moral  judgments  of  self-harm  behaviors.  We  found  general  support  for  our  Dyadic  Self-Harm  hypothesis  where  the  more  others  suffer  as  a  result  of  self-harm,  the  more  immoral  the  behavior  is  judged.  The  extent  to  which  the  individual  was  seen  as  a  victim  or  other  perpetrators  were  identified  corresponded  to  more  lenient  judgments.  We  also  show  that  the  more  people  value  of  personal  autonomy  the  less  immoral  they  judge  self-harm  behaviors.  This  research  combined  qualitative,  correlational,  and  experimental  research  methods  to  further  understand  how  people  make  moral  judgments  of  self-harm  behaviors.  Future  research  is  proposed  to  answer  additional  questions  regarding  this  relatively  unearthed  domain.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0153.
■650  4▼aSocial  psychology
■650  4▼aPersonality  psychology
■650  4▼aPsychology
■650  4▼aNeurosciences
■653    ▼aHarming
■653    ▼aMoral  judgments
■653    ▼aImmorality
■653    ▼aSelf-harm  behaviors
■653    ▼aSuicide
■690    ▼a0451
■690    ▼a0621
■690    ▼a0625
■690    ▼a0317
■71020▼aThe  University  of  North  Carolina  at  Chapel  Hill▼bPsychology.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g85-11B.
■790    ▼a0153
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17160853▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

Preview

Export

ChatGPT Discussion

AI Recommended Related Books


    New Books MORE
    Statistics for the past 3 years. Go to brief

    Подробнее информация.

    • Бронирование
    • не существует
    • моя папка
    • Первый запрос зрения
    • Non-Book Loan Application
    • Nighttime Book Loan Application
    материал
    Reg No. Количество платежных Местоположение статус Ленд информации
    TF12039 전자도서 대출가능 My Folder 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * Бронирование доступны в заимствований книги. Чтобы сделать предварительный заказ, пожалуйста, нажмите кнопку бронирование

    Books borrowed together with this book

    Related Popular Books

    Available after logging in.