본문

서브메뉴

Investigating Content Multidimensionality in a Large-Scale Science Assessment: A Mixed Methods Approach
Investigating Content Multidimensionality in a Large-Scale Science Assessment: A Mixed Met...
Investigating Content Multidimensionality in a Large-Scale Science Assessment: A Mixed Methods Approach

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211151941
ISBN  
9798383565285
DDC  
371
저자명  
Malcom, Cassandra N.
서명/저자  
Investigating Content Multidimensionality in a Large-Scale Science Assessment: A Mixed Methods Approach
발행사항  
[Sl] : University of Oregon, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
218 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Scalise, Kathleen.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) skills are increasingly required of students to be successful in higher education and the workforce. Therefore, modeling assessment outcomes accurately, often using more types of student data to get a complete picture of student learning, is increasingly relevant. The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is promoted as a summative assessment opportunity that includes a science framework. As with many science assessments, the framework includes Life, Physical, and Earth science, which alone seems to imply multidimensionality, and also there are other sources of dimensionality that seem to be described conceptually in the framework. Using data from the 2015 PISA science assessment, a multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model was fit to see how a multidimensional model operates with the data. Before developing the MIRT model, a qualitative review of the framework for multidimensionality took place and exploratory analyses were implemented for the quantitative data, including a data science technique to explore multidimensionality and some factor analysis techniques. After fitting the MIRT model, it was compared to several unidimensional IRT (UIRT) models to determine the model that explains the most variation. The qualitative analyses generated evidence of multidimensional science content domains in the 2015 PISA science framework, which should require a MIRT model, but quantitative analyses indicate a unidimensional model is more practically significant. Once quantitative results were triangulated with the qualitative review of the framework for multidimensionality, the implications on equity and history of harm with regards to science assessments were discussed. Findings from the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the study were used to generate recommendations for different stakeholders.
일반주제명  
Educational tests & measurements
일반주제명  
Secondary education
일반주제명  
Statistics
일반주제명  
Science education
일반주제명  
Educational philosophy
키워드  
Item response theory
키워드  
Large-scale assessment
키워드  
Multidimensionality
키워드  
Qualitative framework review
키워드  
STEM education
키워드  
Summative assessment
기타저자  
University of Oregon Department of Educational Methodology Policy and Leadership
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-01B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017162173
■00520250211151941
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798383565285
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31302257
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a371
■1001  ▼aMalcom,  Cassandra  N.▼0(orcid)0009-0000-9415-1421
■24510▼aInvestigating  Content  Multidimensionality  in  a  Large-Scale  Science  Assessment:  A  Mixed  Methods  Approach
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity  of  Oregon▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a218  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-01,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Scalise,  Kathleen.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  Oregon,  2024.
■520    ▼aScience,  Technology,  Engineering,  and  Math  (STEM)  skills  are  increasingly  required  of  students  to  be  successful  in  higher  education  and  the  workforce.  Therefore,  modeling  assessment  outcomes  accurately,  often  using  more  types  of  student  data  to  get  a  complete  picture  of  student  learning,  is  increasingly  relevant.  The  Program  for  International  Student  Assessment  (PISA)  is  promoted  as  a  summative  assessment  opportunity  that  includes  a  science  framework.  As  with  many  science  assessments,  the  framework  includes  Life,  Physical,  and  Earth  science,  which  alone  seems  to  imply  multidimensionality,  and  also  there  are  other  sources  of  dimensionality  that  seem  to  be  described  conceptually  in  the  framework.  Using  data  from  the  2015  PISA  science  assessment,  a  multidimensional  item  response  theory  (MIRT)  model  was  fit  to  see  how  a  multidimensional  model  operates  with  the  data.  Before  developing  the  MIRT  model,  a  qualitative  review  of  the  framework  for  multidimensionality  took  place  and  exploratory  analyses  were  implemented  for  the  quantitative  data,  including  a  data  science  technique  to  explore  multidimensionality  and  some  factor  analysis  techniques.  After  fitting  the  MIRT  model,  it  was  compared  to  several  unidimensional  IRT  (UIRT)  models  to  determine  the  model  that  explains  the  most  variation.  The  qualitative  analyses  generated  evidence  of  multidimensional  science  content  domains  in  the  2015  PISA  science  framework,  which  should  require  a  MIRT  model,  but  quantitative  analyses  indicate  a  unidimensional  model  is  more practically  significant.  Once  quantitative  results  were  triangulated  with  the  qualitative  review  of  the  framework  for  multidimensionality,  the  implications  on  equity  and  history  of  harm  with  regards  to  science  assessments  were  discussed.  Findings  from  the  qualitative  and  quantitative  aspects  of  the  study  were  used  to  generate  recommendations  for  different  stakeholders.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0171.
■650  4▼aEducational  tests  &  measurements
■650  4▼aSecondary  education
■650  4▼aStatistics
■650  4▼aScience  education
■650  4▼aEducational  philosophy
■653    ▼aItem  response  theory
■653    ▼aLarge-scale  assessment
■653    ▼aMultidimensionality
■653    ▼aQualitative  framework  review
■653    ▼aSTEM  education
■653    ▼aSummative  assessment
■690    ▼a0288
■690    ▼a0533
■690    ▼a0463
■690    ▼a0998
■690    ▼a0714
■71020▼aUniversity  of  Oregon▼bDepartment  of  Educational  Methodology,  Policy,  and  Leadership.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-01B.
■790    ▼a0171
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162173▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF12187 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.