본문

서브메뉴

Exploring Students' Conceptual and Epistemic Learning in Model-Centered Chemistry Courses
Exploring Students' Conceptual and Epistemic Learning in Model-Centered Chemistry Courses
Exploring Students' Conceptual and Epistemic Learning in Model-Centered Chemistry Courses

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211152727
ISBN  
9798383611494
DDC  
540
저자명  
Schwarz, Cara E.
서명/저자  
Exploring Students Conceptual and Epistemic Learning in Model-Centered Chemistry Courses
발행사항  
[Sl] : The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
191 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-02, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Stowe, Ryan L.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약My thesis work is focused on conceptual and epistemic learning and characterizing the environments in which this learning takes place. Earlier studies conducted by the Stowe group explored how instructional practices, instructional emphasis, and assessment emphasis relate to student outcomes in general and organic chemistry courses. Student outcomes were measured using short homework assignments that asked students to model and explain a chemical phenomenon. These studies demonstrated that what is taught and assessed is at least as important as how classes are taught. However, we did not have control over the learning environments in either of these studies. To more carefully investigate the influence of instructional practices on student outcomes, we carried out a study in the context of organic chemistry learning environments we controlled. All course resources were shared, including assessments, and the main difference between learning environments was in the whole-class meetings. Half of the instructors in the study embedded explanation-focused clicker questions into their lecture slides, and therefore ~30% of class time was dedicated to active learning activities. The other half of the instructors lectured the entire time. The results of this study, along with implications for equity, will be discussed. For the second half of my thesis work, I shifted focus from what students drew/wrote to why they constructed knowledge in the ways they did. Specifically, we examined how students' experiences with assessment-related messages about valued ways of knowing and learning (i.e., epistemological messages) aggregated over the course of one semester of an organic chemistry lecture course. To do so, we interviewed nine students three times each throughout the semester. We observed how students' experiences with the course epistemological landscape solidified the way they approached the course and the goals they pursued. Assessments and answer keys were an overwhelmingly powerful source of messages about how students should construct knowledge and what "good" knowledge looks like.
일반주제명  
Chemistry
일반주제명  
Education
일반주제명  
Educational evaluation
일반주제명  
Epistemology
일반주제명  
Science education
키워드  
Epistemic learning
키워드  
Conceptual resources
키워드  
Chemistry courses
키워드  
Instructional practices
키워드  
Student outcomes
기타저자  
The University of Wisconsin - Madison Chemistry
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-02B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017163582
■00520250211152727
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798383611494
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31490349
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a540
■1001  ▼aSchwarz,  Cara  E.
■24510▼aExploring  Students'  Conceptual  and  Epistemic  Learning  in  Model-Centered  Chemistry  Courses
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bThe  University  of  Wisconsin  -  Madison▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a191  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-02,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Stowe,  Ryan  L.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--The  University  of  Wisconsin  -  Madison,  2024.
■520    ▼aMy  thesis  work  is  focused  on  conceptual  and  epistemic  learning  and  characterizing  the  environments  in  which  this  learning  takes  place.  Earlier  studies  conducted  by  the  Stowe  group  explored  how  instructional  practices,  instructional  emphasis,  and  assessment  emphasis  relate  to  student  outcomes  in  general  and  organic  chemistry  courses.  Student  outcomes  were  measured  using  short  homework  assignments  that  asked  students  to  model  and  explain  a  chemical  phenomenon.  These  studies  demonstrated  that  what  is  taught  and  assessed  is  at  least  as  important  as  how  classes  are  taught.  However,  we  did  not  have  control  over  the  learning  environments  in  either  of  these  studies.  To  more  carefully  investigate  the  influence  of  instructional  practices  on  student  outcomes,  we  carried  out  a  study  in  the  context  of  organic  chemistry  learning  environments  we  controlled.  All  course  resources  were  shared,  including  assessments,  and  the  main  difference  between  learning  environments  was  in  the  whole-class  meetings.  Half  of  the  instructors  in  the  study  embedded  explanation-focused  clicker  questions  into  their  lecture  slides,  and  therefore  ~30%  of  class  time  was  dedicated  to  active  learning  activities.  The  other  half  of  the  instructors  lectured  the  entire  time.  The  results  of  this  study,  along  with  implications  for  equity,  will  be  discussed.  For  the  second  half  of  my  thesis  work,  I  shifted  focus  from  what  students  drew/wrote  to  why  they  constructed  knowledge  in  the  ways  they  did.  Specifically,  we  examined  how  students'  experiences  with  assessment-related  messages  about  valued  ways  of  knowing  and  learning  (i.e.,  epistemological  messages)  aggregated  over  the  course  of  one  semester  of  an  organic  chemistry  lecture  course.  To  do  so,  we  interviewed  nine  students  three  times  each  throughout  the  semester.  We  observed  how  students'  experiences  with  the  course  epistemological  landscape  solidified  the  way  they  approached  the  course  and  the  goals  they  pursued.  Assessments  and  answer  keys  were  an  overwhelmingly  powerful  source  of  messages  about  how  students  should  construct  knowledge  and  what  "good"  knowledge  looks  like.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0262.
■650  4▼aChemistry
■650  4▼aEducation
■650  4▼aEducational  evaluation
■650  4▼aEpistemology
■650  4▼aScience  education
■653    ▼aEpistemic  learning
■653    ▼aConceptual  resources
■653    ▼aChemistry  courses
■653    ▼aInstructional  practices
■653    ▼aStudent  outcomes
■690    ▼a0485
■690    ▼a0515
■690    ▼a0443
■690    ▼a0393
■690    ▼a0714
■71020▼aThe  University  of  Wisconsin  -  Madison▼bChemistry.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-02B.
■790    ▼a0262
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17163582▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF12917 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.