본문

서브메뉴

Testing for Differences in Polygenic Scores in the Presence of Confounding
Testing for Differences in Polygenic Scores in the Presence of Confounding
Testing for Differences in Polygenic Scores in the Presence of Confounding

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211153128
ISBN  
9798346875314
DDC  
575
저자명  
Blanc, Jennifer Grace.
서명/저자  
Testing for Differences in Polygenic Scores in the Presence of Confounding
발행사항  
[Sl] : The University of Chicago, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
150 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-06, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Berg, Jeremy J.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Chicago, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약Polygenic scores have become an important tool in human genetics, enabling the prediction of individuals' phenotypes from their genotypes. Understanding how the pattern of differences in polygenic score predictions across individuals intersects with variation in ancestry can provide insights into the evolutionary forces acting on the trait in question, and is important for understanding health disparities. However, because most polygenic scores are computed using effect estimates from population samples, they are susceptible to confounding by both genetic and environmental effects that are correlated with ancestry. The extent to which this confounding drives patterns in the distribution of polygenic scores depends on patterns of population structure in both the original estimation panel and in the prediction/test panel. Here, we use theory from population and statistical genetics, together with simulations and empirical analysis, to study the procedure of testing for an association between polygenic scores and axes of ancestry variation in the presence of confounding. We use a general model of genetic relatedness to describe how confounding in the estimation panel biases the distribution of polygenic scores in a way that depends on the degree of overlap in population structure between panels. We then show how this confounding can bias tests for associations between polygenic scores and important axes of ancestry variation in the test panel. Specifically, for any given test, there exists a single axis of population structure in the GWAS panel that needs to be controlled in order to protect the test. Based on this result, we propose a new approach for directly estimating this axis of population structure in the GWAS panel. We then use simulations to compare the performance of this approach to the standard approach in which the principal components of the GWAS panel genotypes are used to control for stratification. Finally, we develop a hybrid approach for empirical data analysis that uses the test panel genotypes to estimate how well protected any given test is by the inclusion of principal components and apply this approach across a diverse set of tests.
일반주제명  
Genetics
일반주제명  
Statistics
일반주제명  
Biology
일반주제명  
Bioinformatics
키워드  
Polygenic scores
키워드  
Population genetics
키워드  
Statistical genetics
키워드  
GWAS panel
기타저자  
The University of Chicago Human Genetics
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-06B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017165136
■00520250211153128
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798346875314
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31766240
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a575
■1001  ▼aBlanc,  Jennifer  Grace.▼0(orcid)000-0001-7569-018X
■24510▼aTesting  for  Differences  in  Polygenic  Scores  in  the  Presence  of  Confounding
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bThe  University  of  Chicago▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a150  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  86-06,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Berg,  Jeremy  J.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--The  University  of  Chicago,  2024.
■520    ▼aPolygenic  scores  have  become  an  important  tool  in  human  genetics,  enabling  the  prediction  of  individuals'  phenotypes  from  their  genotypes.  Understanding  how  the  pattern  of  differences  in  polygenic  score  predictions  across  individuals  intersects  with  variation  in  ancestry  can  provide  insights  into  the  evolutionary  forces  acting  on  the  trait  in  question,  and  is  important  for  understanding  health  disparities.  However,  because  most  polygenic  scores  are  computed  using  effect  estimates  from  population  samples,  they  are  susceptible  to  confounding  by  both  genetic  and  environmental  effects  that  are  correlated  with  ancestry.  The  extent  to  which  this  confounding  drives  patterns  in  the  distribution  of  polygenic  scores  depends  on  patterns  of  population  structure  in  both  the  original  estimation  panel  and  in  the  prediction/test  panel.  Here,  we  use  theory  from  population  and  statistical  genetics,  together  with  simulations  and  empirical  analysis,  to  study  the  procedure  of  testing  for  an  association  between  polygenic  scores  and  axes  of  ancestry  variation  in  the  presence  of  confounding.  We  use  a  general  model  of  genetic  relatedness  to  describe  how  confounding  in  the  estimation  panel  biases  the  distribution  of  polygenic  scores  in  a  way  that  depends  on  the  degree  of  overlap  in  population  structure  between  panels.  We  then  show  how  this  confounding  can  bias  tests  for  associations  between  polygenic  scores  and  important  axes  of  ancestry  variation  in  the  test  panel.  Specifically,  for  any  given  test,  there  exists  a  single  axis  of  population  structure  in  the  GWAS  panel  that  needs  to  be  controlled  in  order  to  protect  the  test.  Based  on  this  result,  we  propose  a  new  approach  for  directly  estimating  this  axis  of  population  structure  in  the  GWAS  panel.  We  then  use  simulations  to  compare  the  performance  of  this  approach  to  the  standard  approach  in  which  the  principal  components  of  the  GWAS  panel  genotypes  are  used  to  control  for  stratification.  Finally,  we  develop  a  hybrid  approach  for  empirical  data  analysis  that  uses  the  test  panel  genotypes  to  estimate  how  well  protected  any  given  test  is  by  the  inclusion  of  principal  components  and  apply  this  approach  across  a  diverse  set  of  tests.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0330.
■650  4▼aGenetics
■650  4▼aStatistics
■650  4▼aBiology
■650  4▼aBioinformatics
■653    ▼aPolygenic  scores
■653    ▼aPopulation  genetics
■653    ▼aStatistical  genetics
■653    ▼aGWAS  panel
■690    ▼a0369
■690    ▼a0306
■690    ▼a0715
■690    ▼a0463
■71020▼aThe  University  of  Chicago▼bHuman  Genetics.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g86-06B.
■790    ▼a0330
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17165136▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF13269 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.