서브메뉴
검색
Exploring Criminogenic Differences Between Violent, Nonviolent Criminal, and Nonoffending Extremists
Exploring Criminogenic Differences Between Violent, Nonviolent Criminal, and Nonoffending Extremists
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211151131
- ISBN
- 9798382308463
- DDC
- 364
- 저자명
- Turner, Noah D.
- 서명/저자
- Exploring Criminogenic Differences Between Violent, Nonviolent Criminal, and Nonoffending Extremists
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Michigan State University, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 226 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Chermak, Steven.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Existing counterterrorism policy is mostly focused on preventing violent extremism. The problem is violent extremism is rare. Most extremists will never engage in violence. Some extremists will commit nonviolent crimes to advance their cause, such as fraud or vandalism, and others will be involved in legal activities, such as protesting or advocacy. However, little is known about the factors that distinguish violent extremists from their nonviolent and noncriminal counterparts, and prior research in this area has been methodologically limited. To address this gap, this study leverages a multifactor criminological approach by considering how a sample of (n=739) violent, nonviolent criminal, and nonoffending extremists drawn from the Risk and Protective Factors Dataset (RPFD) may differ in the criminogenic risk and protective factors they demonstrate. Latent class analysis is used to derive distinct classes of criminogenic risk, and the LTB method of distal outcome prediction is employed to estimate the relationship between classes of criminogenic risk and the type of action extremists engaged in. Classes with a high probability of strain-related risk factors were most likely to engage in extremist violence. Alternatively, classes with a high probability of protective factors were most likely to be involved in nonviolent or nonoffending extremism. Broadly, these findings reiterate the equifinality and multifinality of extremist violence. Findings from this dissertation have numerous theoretical, methodological, and practical implications. Specifically, this dissertation contributes to the development of criminological theory and advances methods of scientific inquiry into this area of study. Further, this dissertation highlights the importance of considering criminogenic factors in ongoing counterterrorism preventative efforts.
- 일반주제명
- Criminology
- 일반주제명
- Law
- 일반주제명
- Public policy
- 일반주제명
- Law enforcement
- 키워드
- Crime prevention
- 키워드
- Terrorism
- 기타저자
- Michigan State University Criminal Justice - Doctor of Philosophy
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-10A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017160885
■00520250211151131
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798382308463
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31147636
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a364
■1001 ▼aTurner, Noah D.▼0(orcid)0000-0002-0174-7160
■24510▼aExploring Criminogenic Differences Between Violent, Nonviolent Criminal, and Nonoffending Extremists
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bMichigan State University▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a226 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-10, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Chermak, Steven.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Michigan State University, 2024.
■520 ▼aExisting counterterrorism policy is mostly focused on preventing violent extremism. The problem is violent extremism is rare. Most extremists will never engage in violence. Some extremists will commit nonviolent crimes to advance their cause, such as fraud or vandalism, and others will be involved in legal activities, such as protesting or advocacy. However, little is known about the factors that distinguish violent extremists from their nonviolent and noncriminal counterparts, and prior research in this area has been methodologically limited. To address this gap, this study leverages a multifactor criminological approach by considering how a sample of (n=739) violent, nonviolent criminal, and nonoffending extremists drawn from the Risk and Protective Factors Dataset (RPFD) may differ in the criminogenic risk and protective factors they demonstrate. Latent class analysis is used to derive distinct classes of criminogenic risk, and the LTB method of distal outcome prediction is employed to estimate the relationship between classes of criminogenic risk and the type of action extremists engaged in. Classes with a high probability of strain-related risk factors were most likely to engage in extremist violence. Alternatively, classes with a high probability of protective factors were most likely to be involved in nonviolent or nonoffending extremism. Broadly, these findings reiterate the equifinality and multifinality of extremist violence. Findings from this dissertation have numerous theoretical, methodological, and practical implications. Specifically, this dissertation contributes to the development of criminological theory and advances methods of scientific inquiry into this area of study. Further, this dissertation highlights the importance of considering criminogenic factors in ongoing counterterrorism preventative efforts.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0128.
■650 4▼aCriminology
■650 4▼aLaw
■650 4▼aPublic policy
■650 4▼aLaw enforcement
■653 ▼aCrime prevention
■653 ▼aTerrorism
■653 ▼aViolent extremism
■653 ▼aNonoffending extremists
■653 ▼aCriminological theory
■690 ▼a0627
■690 ▼a0398
■690 ▼a0630
■690 ▼a0206
■71020▼aMichigan State University▼bCriminal Justice - Doctor of Philosophy.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-10A.
■790 ▼a0128
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17160885▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
