서브메뉴
검색
Beyond Right and Recognition: Toward a History of Collective Self-determination as the Authorship of Political Personhood
Beyond Right and Recognition: Toward a History of Collective Self-determination as the Authorship of Political Personhood
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211152009
- ISBN
- 9798382837703
- DDC
- 320
- 서명/저자
- Beyond Right and Recognition: Toward a History of Collective Self-determination as the Authorship of Political Personhood
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of California, Los Angeles, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 302 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Pagden, Anthony R.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약The right to self-determination of peoples lies at the core of much global disquiet. Disputes over the practical meaning of the right for all peoples to "pursue their economic, social, and cultural development without outside interference" can lead to domestic conflicts that harden over decades and others capable of enflaming geopolitical crises. I address these disputes by returning to the conceptual history of collective self-determination centering on two sources of contestation: first, who or what authorizes the political existence of a "people" to whom self-determination can apply; and second, the physical and discursive spaces that shape and limit the realization of self-determination. I refer to these considerations as the "authorship of collective personhood." My analysis identifies four interpretations of self-determination that differently understand the authorship of collective personhood: national, international, global, and intrastate. The national understanding, emerging from 19th-century European nationalist revolutions, sees political legitimacy as stemming from a nation's attainment of statehood through liberation from external domination, as exemplified in the thought of Giuseppe Mazzini. International self-determination, which arose in the early 20th century, involved the creation of peoples in line with the ideological and geopolitical interests of external actors, as epitomized by the policies of Vladimir Lenin and Woodrow Wilson. The mid-20th-century global conception of the "right" to self-determination aimed to achieve decolonization through independent statehood, viewing the world as a site of war and peace, universal racial dynamics, and shared colonial "dependency." Lastly, the intrastate transformation of self-determination is characterized by minority and indigenous peoples establishing their political identity within existing states through negotiations over self-governance over issues central to maintaining their collective cultural identity. These interpretations demonstrate how self-determination has accumulated diverse meanings, fueling contemporary conflicts as stakeholders invoke coherent, historically grounded understandings to assert their perceived entitlements. However, despite the challenges posed by this plurality of meanings, I defend an indeterminate understanding of self-determination. Embracing the malleability of self-determination is essential to ensure the enduring relevance of the notion to proffer a resilient framework for asserting autonomy amidst future, unforeseen challenges to collective identity and ways of life.
- 일반주제명
- Political science
- 일반주제명
- International law
- 일반주제명
- Native studies
- 키워드
- Decolonization
- 키워드
- Human rights
- 키워드
- Nationalism
- 키워드
- Political theory
- 기타저자
- University of California, Los Angeles Political Science 0699
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-12A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017162414
■00520250211152009
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798382837703
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31331010
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a320
■1001 ▼aNorton, Anthony Dean.
■24510▼aBeyond Right and Recognition: Toward a History of Collective Self-determination as the Authorship of Political Personhood
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of California, Los Angeles▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a302 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Pagden, Anthony R.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
■520 ▼aThe right to self-determination of peoples lies at the core of much global disquiet. Disputes over the practical meaning of the right for all peoples to "pursue their economic, social, and cultural development without outside interference" can lead to domestic conflicts that harden over decades and others capable of enflaming geopolitical crises. I address these disputes by returning to the conceptual history of collective self-determination centering on two sources of contestation: first, who or what authorizes the political existence of a "people" to whom self-determination can apply; and second, the physical and discursive spaces that shape and limit the realization of self-determination. I refer to these considerations as the "authorship of collective personhood." My analysis identifies four interpretations of self-determination that differently understand the authorship of collective personhood: national, international, global, and intrastate. The national understanding, emerging from 19th-century European nationalist revolutions, sees political legitimacy as stemming from a nation's attainment of statehood through liberation from external domination, as exemplified in the thought of Giuseppe Mazzini. International self-determination, which arose in the early 20th century, involved the creation of peoples in line with the ideological and geopolitical interests of external actors, as epitomized by the policies of Vladimir Lenin and Woodrow Wilson. The mid-20th-century global conception of the "right" to self-determination aimed to achieve decolonization through independent statehood, viewing the world as a site of war and peace, universal racial dynamics, and shared colonial "dependency." Lastly, the intrastate transformation of self-determination is characterized by minority and indigenous peoples establishing their political identity within existing states through negotiations over self-governance over issues central to maintaining their collective cultural identity. These interpretations demonstrate how self-determination has accumulated diverse meanings, fueling contemporary conflicts as stakeholders invoke coherent, historically grounded understandings to assert their perceived entitlements. However, despite the challenges posed by this plurality of meanings, I defend an indeterminate understanding of self-determination. Embracing the malleability of self-determination is essential to ensure the enduring relevance of the notion to proffer a resilient framework for asserting autonomy amidst future, unforeseen challenges to collective identity and ways of life.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0031.
■650 4▼aPolitical science
■650 4▼aInternational law
■650 4▼aNative studies
■653 ▼aDecolonization
■653 ▼aHuman rights
■653 ▼aIntellectual history
■653 ▼aNationalism
■653 ▼aPolitical theory
■653 ▼aSelf-determination
■690 ▼a0615
■690 ▼a0601
■690 ▼a0616
■690 ▼a0741
■71020▼aUniversity of California, Los Angeles▼bPolitical Science 0699.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g85-12A.
■790 ▼a0031
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162414▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
