서브메뉴
검색
"Adults See Everything as Dangerous Except Themselves": A Critical Discourse Analysis of Safety, Policing, and Protection in Schools
"Adults See Everything as Dangerous Except Themselves": A Critical Discourse Analysis of Safety, Policing, and Protection in Schools
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20250211152010
- ISBN
- 9798383565339
- DDC
- 370
- 서명/저자
- Adults See Everything as Dangerous Except Themselves: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Safety, Policing, and Protection in Schools
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of Oregon, 2024
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
- 형태사항
- 282 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Sabzalian, Leilani.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2024.
- 초록/해제
- 요약This study explores ideologies, discourses, and representations of school safety and policing within the United States educational system, motivated by the imperative to understand the transmission and impact of these ideologies on the broader societal constructs of safety, punishment, and mass incarceration. Drawing from the frameworks of corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), three central research questions guide the investigation: 1) How do different educational community members (students, policy makers, and community) define school safety (safety for whom, safety from what)?; 2) How do different educational community members (students, policy makers, and community) discursively produce police as safe or unsafe in schools?; 3) What do discourses of school safety and policing show us about the ways students are positioned as dangerous (and by whom), which students are positioned as dangerous, and who must be protected and from what within schools?Analyzing multiple datasets, including school board meetings, online public comments, and conversations with students, the study uncovers both commonalities and tensions within educational communities regarding representations of policing, schools, and students. It identifies shared discursive strategies alongside ideological tensions, highlighting the perpetuation, privileging, and challenging of certain beliefs about policing and about young people that move across contexts and social histories.A significant finding of the research is the central role of adultism in maintaining the interconnectedness between the school and prison systems, thereby perpetuating mass incarceration. This revelation prompts the introduction of YouthCrit as a framework to explicitly address adultism as a unique form of oppression intertwined with other institutional subjugations, and to disrupt carceral logics rooted in colonialism and heteropaternalism.Ultimately, this study advocates for a deeper understanding of the school-prison nexus and emphasizes the importance of challenging deficit representations of students. It calls upon scholars, educators, and practitioners to center the voices and agency of young people in research, interventions, and social movements for community safety.
- 일반주제명
- Education
- 일반주제명
- Educational sociology
- 일반주제명
- Education policy
- 일반주제명
- Law enforcement
- 키워드
- Abolition
- 키워드
- Adultism
- 키워드
- YouthCrit
- 기타저자
- University of Oregon Department of Education Studies
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-01A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008250123s2024 us c eng d■001000017162423
■00520250211152010
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798383565339
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31331103
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a370
■1001 ▼aSpringer, Shareen Rawlings.▼0(orcid)0000-0001-5192-0526
■24510▼a"Adults See Everything as Dangerous Except Themselves": A Critical Discourse Analysis of Safety, Policing, and Protection in Schools
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of Oregon▼c2024
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2024
■300 ▼a282 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-01, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Sabzalian, Leilani.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2024.
■520 ▼aThis study explores ideologies, discourses, and representations of school safety and policing within the United States educational system, motivated by the imperative to understand the transmission and impact of these ideologies on the broader societal constructs of safety, punishment, and mass incarceration. Drawing from the frameworks of corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), three central research questions guide the investigation: 1) How do different educational community members (students, policy makers, and community) define school safety (safety for whom, safety from what)?; 2) How do different educational community members (students, policy makers, and community) discursively produce police as safe or unsafe in schools?; 3) What do discourses of school safety and policing show us about the ways students are positioned as dangerous (and by whom), which students are positioned as dangerous, and who must be protected and from what within schools?Analyzing multiple datasets, including school board meetings, online public comments, and conversations with students, the study uncovers both commonalities and tensions within educational communities regarding representations of policing, schools, and students. It identifies shared discursive strategies alongside ideological tensions, highlighting the perpetuation, privileging, and challenging of certain beliefs about policing and about young people that move across contexts and social histories.A significant finding of the research is the central role of adultism in maintaining the interconnectedness between the school and prison systems, thereby perpetuating mass incarceration. This revelation prompts the introduction of YouthCrit as a framework to explicitly address adultism as a unique form of oppression intertwined with other institutional subjugations, and to disrupt carceral logics rooted in colonialism and heteropaternalism.Ultimately, this study advocates for a deeper understanding of the school-prison nexus and emphasizes the importance of challenging deficit representations of students. It calls upon scholars, educators, and practitioners to center the voices and agency of young people in research, interventions, and social movements for community safety.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0171.
■650 4▼aEducation
■650 4▼aEducational sociology
■650 4▼aEducation policy
■650 4▼aLaw enforcement
■653 ▼aAbolition
■653 ▼aAdultism
■653 ▼aCritical Discourse Analysis
■653 ▼aCritical youth studies
■653 ▼aSchool prison nexus
■653 ▼aYouthCrit
■690 ▼a0515
■690 ▼a0340
■690 ▼a0206
■690 ▼a0458
■71020▼aUniversity of Oregon▼bDepartment of Education Studies.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-01A.
■790 ▼a0171
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2024
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17162423▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
