본문

From the Lab to the Classroom: Effects of Embodied Pedagogies on Students' Learning of Statistical Concepts
From the Lab to the Classroom: Effects of Embodied Pedagogies on Students' Learning of Sta...
From the Lab to the Classroom: Effects of Embodied Pedagogies on Students' Learning of Statistical Concepts

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20250211151511
ISBN  
9798382740942
DDC  
370
저자명  
Zhang, Icy.
서명/저자  
From the Lab to the Classroom: Effects of Embodied Pedagogies on Students Learning of Statistical Concepts
발행사항  
[Sl] : University of California, Los Angeles, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
160 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-11, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Stigler, James W.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약The idea that people learn from sensorimotor experiences, whether through performing actions themselves or observing others, has garnered increasing attention from researchers in psychology, cognitive science, computer science, and education. In teaching and learning research, a key question is whether these sensorimotor experiences can help students acquire abstract concepts in complex domains. Past research has revealed promising evidence in various domains such as mathematics and physics regarding the benefit of incorporating some sort of bodily actions into learning. However, our understanding of how different types of bodily experiences impact learning is still nascent. Questions remain about the effect, mechanism, and practical application of using embodied experiences to help learners learn abstract knowledge in complex domains. These inquiries lead to a series of laboratory experiments and classroom interventions that I will present across three chapters, each written as a discrete empirical article that either has been published or is in preparation for publication. Across three chapters, the work was conducted in the field of statistics and data science education, which was picked because the concepts are intrinsically abstract and difficult, but they simultaneously do not require a sophisticated mathematical background. The first question focuses on the effect of observing bodily actions. Whereas abundant evidence has demonstrated the effect of performing actions, the concept of observing actions is less explored. Would simply observing hands-on representations lead to an increase in learning? This question is answered in Chapter 1, a published work that demonstrates the efficacy of observing hands-on representations in improving students' understanding of randomness and the shuffle() function in R programming used to simulate randomness. The second question focuses on the mechanism underlying the effect-an embodied representation has more sensorimotor engagement and visuospatial concreteness than an abstract representation, but does sensorimotor engagement offer a unique benefit beyond visuospatial concreteness? Chapter 2 is a manuscript under review that reports on a laboratory experiment designed to isolate the effect of sensorimotor engagement. The findings suggest that sensorimotor engagement offers a unique benefit beyond visuospatial concreteness by helping learners develop more robust visuospatial representations. The last question relates to the practical application of different types of embodied interventions when we have learners with diverse levels of prior knowledge in the classroom. Theories in embodied cognition, along with other empirical evidence in both motor and learning domains, suggest that humans rely on their knowledge of their own bodies to understand other people's movements. This insight prompted me to ask whether learners' prior knowledge would moderate the type of embodied intervention (i.e. performing versus observing) on learning. The third Chapter reports on the design of a curriculum-linked embodied intervention to implement embodied activities over the entire school term of a college-level introductory statistics course. Students were randomly assigned the role of a performer or an observer. The findings provided support for the Perform-First hypothesis, showing that compared to observing, performing hands-on activities diminished the correlation between prior knowledge and post-test performance. Overall, this body of work extends the theory of embodied learning and offers practical insights for teachers and curriculum developers about how to implement embodied interventions into their educational materials and instructions.
일반주제명  
Educational psychology
일반주제명  
Developmental psychology
일반주제명  
Pedagogy
일반주제명  
Psychology
키워드  
Embodied learning
키워드  
STEM education
키워드  
Translational research
키워드  
Cognitive science
키워드  
Educational material
기타저자  
University of California, Los Angeles Psychology 0780
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 85-11B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008250123s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017161989
■00520250211151511
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798382740942
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31299846
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a370
■1001  ▼aZhang,  Icy.
■24510▼aFrom  the  Lab  to  the  Classroom:  Effects  of  Embodied  Pedagogies  on  Students'  Learning  of  Statistical  Concepts
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity  of  California,  Los  Angeles▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a160  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  85-11,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Stigler,  James  W.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  California,  Los  Angeles,  2024.
■520    ▼aThe  idea  that  people  learn  from  sensorimotor  experiences,  whether  through  performing  actions  themselves  or  observing  others,  has  garnered  increasing  attention  from  researchers  in  psychology,  cognitive  science,  computer  science,  and  education.  In  teaching  and  learning  research,  a  key  question  is  whether  these  sensorimotor  experiences  can  help  students  acquire  abstract  concepts  in  complex  domains.  Past  research  has  revealed  promising  evidence  in  various  domains  such  as  mathematics  and  physics  regarding  the  benefit  of  incorporating  some  sort  of  bodily  actions  into  learning.  However,  our  understanding  of  how  different  types  of  bodily  experiences  impact  learning  is  still  nascent.  Questions  remain  about  the  effect,  mechanism,  and  practical  application  of  using  embodied  experiences  to  help  learners  learn  abstract  knowledge  in  complex  domains.  These  inquiries  lead  to  a  series  of  laboratory  experiments  and  classroom  interventions  that  I  will  present  across  three  chapters,  each  written  as  a  discrete  empirical  article  that  either  has  been  published  or  is  in  preparation  for  publication.  Across  three  chapters,  the  work  was  conducted  in  the  field  of  statistics  and  data  science  education,  which  was  picked  because  the  concepts  are  intrinsically  abstract  and  difficult,  but  they  simultaneously  do  not  require  a  sophisticated  mathematical  background.  The  first  question  focuses  on  the  effect  of  observing  bodily  actions.  Whereas  abundant  evidence  has  demonstrated  the  effect  of  performing  actions,  the  concept  of  observing  actions  is  less  explored.  Would  simply  observing  hands-on  representations  lead  to  an  increase  in  learning?  This  question  is  answered  in  Chapter  1,  a  published  work  that  demonstrates  the  efficacy  of  observing  hands-on  representations  in  improving  students'  understanding  of  randomness  and  the  shuffle()  function  in  R  programming  used  to  simulate  randomness.  The  second  question  focuses  on  the  mechanism  underlying  the  effect-an  embodied  representation  has  more  sensorimotor  engagement  and  visuospatial  concreteness  than  an  abstract  representation,  but  does  sensorimotor  engagement  offer  a  unique  benefit  beyond  visuospatial  concreteness?  Chapter  2  is  a  manuscript  under  review  that  reports  on  a  laboratory  experiment  designed  to  isolate  the  effect  of  sensorimotor  engagement.  The  findings  suggest  that  sensorimotor  engagement  offers  a  unique  benefit  beyond  visuospatial  concreteness  by  helping  learners  develop  more  robust  visuospatial  representations.  The  last  question  relates  to  the  practical  application  of  different  types  of  embodied  interventions  when  we  have  learners  with  diverse  levels  of  prior  knowledge  in  the  classroom.  Theories  in  embodied  cognition,  along  with  other  empirical  evidence  in  both  motor  and  learning  domains,  suggest  that  humans  rely  on  their  knowledge  of  their  own  bodies  to  understand  other  people's  movements.  This  insight  prompted  me  to  ask  whether  learners'  prior  knowledge  would  moderate  the  type  of  embodied  intervention  (i.e.  performing  versus  observing)  on  learning.  The  third  Chapter  reports  on  the  design  of  a  curriculum-linked  embodied  intervention  to  implement  embodied  activities  over  the  entire  school  term  of  a  college-level  introductory  statistics  course.  Students  were  randomly  assigned  the  role  of  a  performer  or  an  observer.  The  findings  provided  support  for  the  Perform-First  hypothesis,  showing  that  compared  to  observing,  performing  hands-on  activities  diminished  the  correlation  between  prior  knowledge  and  post-test  performance.  Overall,  this  body  of  work  extends  the  theory  of  embodied  learning  and  offers  practical  insights  for  teachers  and  curriculum  developers  about  how  to  implement  embodied  interventions  into  their  educational  materials  and  instructions.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0031.
■650  4▼aEducational  psychology
■650  4▼aDevelopmental  psychology
■650  4▼aPedagogy
■650  4▼aPsychology
■653    ▼aEmbodied  learning
■653    ▼aSTEM  education
■653    ▼aTranslational  research
■653    ▼aCognitive  science
■653    ▼aEducational  material
■690    ▼a0525
■690    ▼a0620
■690    ▼a0621
■690    ▼a0456
■71020▼aUniversity  of  California,  Los  Angeles▼bPsychology  0780.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g85-11B.
■790    ▼a0031
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17161989▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF14179 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.