서브메뉴
검색
Thirty-Five Years of Intimate Partner Homicide Discourse by Minnesota's Statewide Domestic Violence Coalition, 1989-2023
Thirty-Five Years of Intimate Partner Homicide Discourse by Minnesota's Statewide Domestic Violence Coalition, 1989-2023
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103617
- ISBN
- 9798286442232
- DDC
- 361
- 저자명
- Dorman, Amy R.
- 서명/저자
- Thirty-Five Years of Intimate Partner Homicide Discourse by Minnesotas Statewide Domestic Violence Coalition, 1989-2023
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of Minnesota, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 327 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Renner, Lynette M.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Dozens of Minnesotans are killed every year in intimate partner homicides (IPH). Minnesota's statewide domestic violence coalition (SDVC) is the only entity to systematically collect and present data on this social issue through their annual IPH reports. How a social issue is framed impacts the way the issue is understood by policymakers and the public, influencing how and to what extent the social issue is addressed. IPH is often mischaracterized in the news media in the United States, and little research has been conducted around how other policy actors, like SDVCs, frame IPH in their social issue discourse. Thus, this study used case study methods to better understand the changes to Minnesota's SDVC's framing of IPH as a social issue over time, and what micro, mezzo, and macro factors may have influenced those changes. Analysis was conducted across multiple data sources: the 35 annual IPH reports published by Minnesota's SDVC, the SDVC's archival collection from the University of Minnesota Social Welfare Archives, timeline mapping of sociohistorical events, and qualitative interviews with nine of the report authors. Within-case and cross-case analyses were employed. The study identified the key change to the IPH reports over time as a shift from a mainstream feminist frame with a criminal legal focus to an intersectional feminist frame with a public health orientation. Report authors were identified as the most frequent and strongest influences to changes to the IPH reports, within the context of a collaborative organizational structure at the SDVC that aligned with feminist organization principles. Additional within-case and cross-case changes and influences are presented, and implications for future framing of IPH as a social issue in Minnesota are discussed.
- 일반주제명
- Social work
- 일반주제명
- Public policy
- 일반주제명
- History
- 키워드
- Case study
- 키워드
- Discourse
- 기타저자
- University of Minnesota Social Work
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-12A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017357911
■00520260202103617
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798286442232
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32044721
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a361
■1001 ▼aDorman, Amy R.
■24510▼aThirty-Five Years of Intimate Partner Homicide Discourse by Minnesota's Statewide Domestic Violence Coalition, 1989-2023
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of Minnesota▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a327 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Renner, Lynette M.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2025.
■520 ▼aDozens of Minnesotans are killed every year in intimate partner homicides (IPH). Minnesota's statewide domestic violence coalition (SDVC) is the only entity to systematically collect and present data on this social issue through their annual IPH reports. How a social issue is framed impacts the way the issue is understood by policymakers and the public, influencing how and to what extent the social issue is addressed. IPH is often mischaracterized in the news media in the United States, and little research has been conducted around how other policy actors, like SDVCs, frame IPH in their social issue discourse. Thus, this study used case study methods to better understand the changes to Minnesota's SDVC's framing of IPH as a social issue over time, and what micro, mezzo, and macro factors may have influenced those changes. Analysis was conducted across multiple data sources: the 35 annual IPH reports published by Minnesota's SDVC, the SDVC's archival collection from the University of Minnesota Social Welfare Archives, timeline mapping of sociohistorical events, and qualitative interviews with nine of the report authors. Within-case and cross-case analyses were employed. The study identified the key change to the IPH reports over time as a shift from a mainstream feminist frame with a criminal legal focus to an intersectional feminist frame with a public health orientation. Report authors were identified as the most frequent and strongest influences to changes to the IPH reports, within the context of a collaborative organizational structure at the SDVC that aligned with feminist organization principles. Additional within-case and cross-case changes and influences are presented, and implications for future framing of IPH as a social issue in Minnesota are discussed.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0130.
■650 4▼aSocial work
■650 4▼aPublic policy
■650 4▼aHistory
■653 ▼aCase study
■653 ▼aDiscourse
■653 ▼aIntimate partner homicide
■653 ▼aSocial issue frame
■690 ▼a0452
■690 ▼a0630
■690 ▼a0578
■71020▼aUniversity of Minnesota▼bSocial Work.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-12A.
■790 ▼a0130
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17357911▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
