서브메뉴
검색
Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States
Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103617
- ISBN
- 9798270297671
- DDC
- 614
- 서명/저자
- Food Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 194 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-07, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Ribisl, Kurt M.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Introduction. Gentrification may affect cardiometabolic health, but most studies are limited by lack of longitudinal data. To accurately assess impacts on original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods, it is necessary to follow individuals who remain in their neighborhoods (stayers) and those who leave (movers). Methods. Gentrification measures derived from the US census and retail measures derived from the National Establishment Time Series were linked to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Study 1 assessed longitudinal associations between gentrification and the proportion of food retailers generally providing healthy food. Study 2 assessed cross-sectional associations between gentrification and cardiometabolic risk factors (metabolic syndrome and its components, food and housing insecurity, stress, racial discrimination). Both studies focused on residents of census tracts eligible for gentrification who grew up in below-median income households, examined two time periods (Wave 3 to 4 [N=3,397], Wave 4 to 5 [N=2,836]), and assessed moderation by self-reported race/ethnicity. Results. In Study 1, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with a lower share of healthy food retailers in the overall sample and among White participants; there were no associations for movers. Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with a higher share of healthy retailers for Black stayers, but not other stayers, and a lower share of healthy retailers for Hispanic/Latino movers, but not other movers. In Study 2, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with lower food insecurity and fast food consumption in the overall sample. These beneficial associations were driven by White participants; meanwhile, there were harmful associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black stayers (racial discrimination) and movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino stayers (low HDL-cholesterol) and movers (hypertension). Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with higher odds of central obesity in the overall sample for stayers, but there were beneficial associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino movers (hypertension). Conclusions. Gentrification is not consistently harmful or beneficial for cardiometabolic health of original residents. Policymakers should not assume gentrification improves food environments or chronic disease risk.
- 일반주제명
- Public health
- 일반주제명
- Urban planning
- 일반주제명
- Nutrition
- 키워드
- Dietary behavior
- 키워드
- Gentrification
- 기타저자
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Health Behavior
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-07B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017357914
■00520260202103617
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798270297671
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32044819
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a614
■1001 ▼aHalvorson-Fried, Sarah M.
■24510▼aFood Access and Chronic Disease Risk Among Original Residents of Gentrifying Neighborhoods in the United States
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a194 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-07, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Ribisl, Kurt M.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2025.
■520 ▼aIntroduction. Gentrification may affect cardiometabolic health, but most studies are limited by lack of longitudinal data. To accurately assess impacts on original residents of gentrifying neighborhoods, it is necessary to follow individuals who remain in their neighborhoods (stayers) and those who leave (movers). Methods. Gentrification measures derived from the US census and retail measures derived from the National Establishment Time Series were linked to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Study 1 assessed longitudinal associations between gentrification and the proportion of food retailers generally providing healthy food. Study 2 assessed cross-sectional associations between gentrification and cardiometabolic risk factors (metabolic syndrome and its components, food and housing insecurity, stress, racial discrimination). Both studies focused on residents of census tracts eligible for gentrification who grew up in below-median income households, examined two time periods (Wave 3 to 4 [N=3,397], Wave 4 to 5 [N=2,836]), and assessed moderation by self-reported race/ethnicity. Results. In Study 1, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with a lower share of healthy food retailers in the overall sample and among White participants; there were no associations for movers. Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with a higher share of healthy retailers for Black stayers, but not other stayers, and a lower share of healthy retailers for Hispanic/Latino movers, but not other movers. In Study 2, among stayers, gentrification from Wave 3 to 4 was associated with lower food insecurity and fast food consumption in the overall sample. These beneficial associations were driven by White participants; meanwhile, there were harmful associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black stayers (racial discrimination) and movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino stayers (low HDL-cholesterol) and movers (hypertension). Gentrification from Wave 4 to 5 was associated with higher odds of central obesity in the overall sample for stayers, but there were beneficial associations between gentrification and risk factors for Black movers (central obesity) and Hispanic/Latino movers (hypertension). Conclusions. Gentrification is not consistently harmful or beneficial for cardiometabolic health of original residents. Policymakers should not assume gentrification improves food environments or chronic disease risk.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0153.
■650 4▼aPublic health
■650 4▼aUrban planning
■650 4▼aNutrition
■653 ▼aDietary behavior
■653 ▼aFood environments
■653 ▼aGentrification
■653 ▼aMetabolic syndrome
■653 ▼aResidential mobility
■653 ▼aSocial determinants of health
■690 ▼a0573
■690 ▼a0999
■690 ▼a0570
■71020▼aThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill▼bHealth Behavior.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-07B.
■790 ▼a0153
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17357914▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
