서브메뉴
검색
Music Therapy Censorship Practices in a Public School System: A Mixed Methods Analysis
Music Therapy Censorship Practices in a Public School System: A Mixed Methods Analysis
Detailed Information
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103012
- ISBN
- 9798280716667
- DDC
- 615.85
- 서명/저자
- Music Therapy Censorship Practices in a Public School System: A Mixed Methods Analysis
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : The Florida State University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 97 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Gooding, Lori F.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Music therapists have often faced the question of whether or not to censor music that has been deemed inappropriate. To date, there has been little research on how, why, and to what extent music therapists censor the music they use in clinical interventions. The existing research on music therapists' censorship practices has primarily focused on mental health settings. Specifically, there has been a lack of scholarship focused on how music therapists working in K-12 public school systems navigate censorship. The purpose of this study was to describe censorship practices of music therapists working within a K-12 public school system. The research questions were: (1) Do music therapists within the school system ever have to censor?, (2) If music therapists do censor, what elements do they censor most often?, (3) What factors within public school music therapists' work impact their censorship decisions?, (4) What methods do music therapists utilize in their censorship practice?, and (5) Who and/or what enforces censorship practices within the school system? . This explanatory sequential study took place in three phases. In Phase 1, board-certified music therapists working in a public school system (N = 13) in the Southeastern United States completed an 18 question survey regarding their use of censorship within the school based music therapy sessions. In Phase 2, a subset of participants (n = 7) who completed Phase 1 engaged in 1:1 interviews with the primary investigator. During these interviews, participants elaborated on their understanding of music therapy censorship practices. Using information gathered from Phase 2, the primary investigator conducted a content analysis of policies (N = 22) relevant to participants' censorship in Phase 3. Results indicated that most participants had to use censorship at least occasionally in their music therapy sessions. Most reported that material related to violence, substance use, and/or sexual references would most likely require some degree of censorship. Through interpretative phenomenological analysis, data generated through interviews revealed that most participants censored musical elements that did not match with their definition of school appropriate. Participants most commonly expressed utilizing "clean" recordings of songs to censor music used in sessions, but the types of clean recordings utilized varied. When considering various scenarios in their work, most participants had strong opinions for or against censorship. Even so, there was a discrepancy in knowledge of censorship policies at the state/federal, school, and department level. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
- 일반주제명
- Music therapy
- 일반주제명
- Music education
- 키워드
- Adolescents
- 키워드
- Censorship
- 기타저자
- The Florida State University Music
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-12A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017356662
■00520260202103012
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798280716667
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31842816
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a615.85
■1001 ▼aAustin, Molly Susan.▼0(orcid)0009-0006-9168-9393
■24510▼aMusic Therapy Censorship Practices in a Public School System: A Mixed Methods Analysis
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bThe Florida State University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a97 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Gooding, Lori F.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The Florida State University, 2025.
■520 ▼aMusic therapists have often faced the question of whether or not to censor music that has been deemed inappropriate. To date, there has been little research on how, why, and to what extent music therapists censor the music they use in clinical interventions. The existing research on music therapists' censorship practices has primarily focused on mental health settings. Specifically, there has been a lack of scholarship focused on how music therapists working in K-12 public school systems navigate censorship. The purpose of this study was to describe censorship practices of music therapists working within a K-12 public school system. The research questions were: (1) Do music therapists within the school system ever have to censor?, (2) If music therapists do censor, what elements do they censor most often?, (3) What factors within public school music therapists' work impact their censorship decisions?, (4) What methods do music therapists utilize in their censorship practice?, and (5) Who and/or what enforces censorship practices within the school system? . This explanatory sequential study took place in three phases. In Phase 1, board-certified music therapists working in a public school system (N = 13) in the Southeastern United States completed an 18 question survey regarding their use of censorship within the school based music therapy sessions. In Phase 2, a subset of participants (n = 7) who completed Phase 1 engaged in 1:1 interviews with the primary investigator. During these interviews, participants elaborated on their understanding of music therapy censorship practices. Using information gathered from Phase 2, the primary investigator conducted a content analysis of policies (N = 22) relevant to participants' censorship in Phase 3. Results indicated that most participants had to use censorship at least occasionally in their music therapy sessions. Most reported that material related to violence, substance use, and/or sexual references would most likely require some degree of censorship. Through interpretative phenomenological analysis, data generated through interviews revealed that most participants censored musical elements that did not match with their definition of school appropriate. Participants most commonly expressed utilizing "clean" recordings of songs to censor music used in sessions, but the types of clean recordings utilized varied. When considering various scenarios in their work, most participants had strong opinions for or against censorship. Even so, there was a discrepancy in knowledge of censorship policies at the state/federal, school, and department level. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0071.
■650 4▼aMusic therapy
■650 4▼aMusic education
■653 ▼aAdolescents
■653 ▼aCensorship
■653 ▼aCensorship policies
■653 ▼aMusic therapy and public schools
■690 ▼a0209
■690 ▼a0522
■71020▼aThe Florida State University▼bMusic.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-12A.
■790 ▼a0071
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17356662▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
Preview
Export
ChatGPT Discussion
AI Recommended Related Books
Подробнее информация.
- Бронирование
- не существует
- моя папка
- Первый запрос зрения
- Non-Book Loan Application
- Nighttime Book Loan Application
Available after logging in.


