서브메뉴
검색
Evaluation Theory and Curriculum in the Field of Public Health: the Existing Curriculum Landscape, Views from Course Instructors, and Implications for Public Health Curriculum
Evaluation Theory and Curriculum in the Field of Public Health: the Existing Curriculum Landscape, Views from Course Instructors, and Implications for Public Health Curriculum
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202104713
- ISBN
- 9798290909998
- DDC
- 614
- 서명/저자
- Evaluation Theory and Curriculum in the Field of Public Health: the Existing Curriculum Landscape, Views from Course Instructors, and Implications for Public Health Curriculum
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of Minnesota, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 105 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-01, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Weerts, David J.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Evaluation is a critical part of public health programs and has long been identified by public health scholars as a needed skill. As the number of public health undergraduate degrees expands, so does the number of students learning evaluation through a public health lens. Despite the documented need for evaluation in public health contexts and the rapid increase of public health undergraduate degrees, not much is known about the curricular make-up of evaluation courses for undergraduate students. Likewise, no attention has been paid to the presence of evaluation theory in undergraduate public health evaluation courses.This dissertation examined curriculum for undergraduate public health degrees accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health in the United States and interviewed 10 instructors who teach undergraduate evaluation coursework. Courses were categorized based on their evaluation content and presence of evaluation theory. Instructors were asked about their experiences teaching evaluation to public health undergraduate students and evaluation theory. Evaluation courses were not common in undergraduate public health curriculum. When evaluation courses appeared, they often were limited in scope and focused on evaluation as a specific tool rather than a larger process. The interviews revealed three themes: Teaching evaluation to undergraduate students is challenging, evaluation instruction is important, and there is a lack of evaluation theory at undergraduate levels. More comprehensive evaluation education is necessary to answer calls from the field of public health for more rigorous evaluation. Evaluation scholars can provide resources to help augment evaluation curriculum for undergraduate public health students.
- 일반주제명
- Public health
- 일반주제명
- Curriculum development
- 일반주제명
- Higher education
- 일반주제명
- Public health education
- 일반주제명
- Public policy
- 키워드
- Evaluation
- 기타저자
- University of Minnesota Organizational Leadership Policy and Development
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-01B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017358514
■00520260202104713
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798290909998
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32119140
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a614
■1001 ▼aWright, Morgan McCord.
■24510▼aEvaluation Theory and Curriculum in the Field of Public Health: the Existing Curriculum Landscape, Views from Course Instructors, and Implications for Public Health Curriculum
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of Minnesota▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a105 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-01, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Weerts, David J.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Minnesota, 2025.
■520 ▼aEvaluation is a critical part of public health programs and has long been identified by public health scholars as a needed skill. As the number of public health undergraduate degrees expands, so does the number of students learning evaluation through a public health lens. Despite the documented need for evaluation in public health contexts and the rapid increase of public health undergraduate degrees, not much is known about the curricular make-up of evaluation courses for undergraduate students. Likewise, no attention has been paid to the presence of evaluation theory in undergraduate public health evaluation courses.This dissertation examined curriculum for undergraduate public health degrees accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health in the United States and interviewed 10 instructors who teach undergraduate evaluation coursework. Courses were categorized based on their evaluation content and presence of evaluation theory. Instructors were asked about their experiences teaching evaluation to public health undergraduate students and evaluation theory. Evaluation courses were not common in undergraduate public health curriculum. When evaluation courses appeared, they often were limited in scope and focused on evaluation as a specific tool rather than a larger process. The interviews revealed three themes: Teaching evaluation to undergraduate students is challenging, evaluation instruction is important, and there is a lack of evaluation theory at undergraduate levels. More comprehensive evaluation education is necessary to answer calls from the field of public health for more rigorous evaluation. Evaluation scholars can provide resources to help augment evaluation curriculum for undergraduate public health students.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0130.
■650 4▼aPublic health
■650 4▼aCurriculum development
■650 4▼aHigher education
■650 4▼aPublic health education
■650 4▼aPublic policy
■653 ▼aEvaluation
■653 ▼aEvaluation theory
■653 ▼aPublic health curriculum
■653 ▼aPublic health evaluation
■653 ▼aUndergraduate public health curriculum
■690 ▼a0573
■690 ▼a0727
■690 ▼a0745
■690 ▼a0500
■690 ▼a0630
■71020▼aUniversity of Minnesota▼bOrganizational Leadership, Policy, and Development.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-01B.
■790 ▼a0130
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17358514▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
