본문

서브메뉴

Civic Discourse Pedagogies in American Higher Education: Tracing Historical Patterns, Enduring Paradigms, and Future Possibilities
Civic Discourse Pedagogies in American Higher Education: Tracing Historical Patterns, Endu...
Civic Discourse Pedagogies in American Higher Education: Tracing Historical Patterns, Enduring Paradigms, and Future Possibilities

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20260202105119
ISBN  
9798265410375
DDC  
378
저자명  
Cohen, Maya Holden.
서명/저자  
Civic Discourse Pedagogies in American Higher Education: Tracing Historical Patterns, Enduring Paradigms, and Future Possibilities
발행사항  
[Sl] : Harvard University, 2025
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
형태사항  
244 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-05, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Levinson, Meira.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2025.
초록/해제  
요약Civic discourse on college campuses has become a flashpoint in American politics. Amid deep political division, rising threats to freedom of inquiry and speech, and declining public trust, colleges and universities are seeking ways to teach and practice the communication across difference so essential to their civic, educational, and scholarly missions. Importantly, this is not the first time institutions of higher education have sought new approaches to civic discourse education in response to profound societal changes and challenges. They have done so repeatedly, stretching back to higher education's earliest days in colonial America. In this dissertation, I draw on histories of American politics, higher education, ideas, and philosophy to make two core arguments. First, I demonstrate that the emergence of civic discourse pedagogies in American higher education has followed a historical pattern: Societal change has generated new visions of politics; together with the transformative forces that shaped them, these visions have led to new conceptions of higher education's mission and new ideas about the kinds of citizens higher education should aim to produce. These conceptions have demanded new approaches to civic education, spurring the creation of new ways to teach civic discourse. Second, I argue that these new pedagogies were not just instructional innovations. Rather, they were products of new paradigms of civic discourse practice and pedagogy, rooted in specific notions of personhood, power, and social epistemology. I build this argument by analyzing three examples of pedagogical emergence: the development of forensic debate in the mid-1700s; deliberative discussion in the early 20th century; and intergroup dialogue in the late 1980s. These models of pedagogical emergence and paradigm development constitute new scholarly contributions-ones that provide analytical tools that can help us understand and reframe our contemporary challenges of civic discourse. In my final chapters, I demonstrate this point by applying these models to our recent history. Ultimately, my hope is that viewing campus civic discourse in historical perspective can support the vital work of sustaining conversations across difference amid the critical challenges facing higher education today.
일반주제명  
Higher education
일반주제명  
Education
일반주제명  
Pedagogy
키워드  
Civic discourse
키워드  
American politics
키워드  
Pedagogical emergence
기타저자  
Harvard University Education
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-05A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008260126s2025        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017359439
■00520260202105119
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798265410375
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32238118
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a378
■1001  ▼aCohen,  Maya  Holden.
■24510▼aCivic  Discourse  Pedagogies  in  American  Higher  Education:  Tracing  Historical  Patterns,  Enduring  Paradigms,  and  Future  Possibilities
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bHarvard  University▼c2025
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2025
■300    ▼a244  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  87-05,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Levinson,  Meira.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--Harvard  University,  2025.
■520    ▼aCivic  discourse  on  college  campuses  has  become  a  flashpoint  in  American  politics.  Amid  deep  political  division,  rising  threats  to  freedom  of  inquiry  and  speech,  and  declining  public  trust,  colleges  and  universities  are  seeking  ways  to  teach  and  practice  the  communication  across  difference  so  essential  to  their  civic,  educational,  and  scholarly  missions.  Importantly,  this  is  not  the  first  time  institutions  of  higher  education  have  sought  new  approaches  to  civic  discourse  education  in  response  to  profound  societal  changes  and  challenges.  They  have  done  so  repeatedly,  stretching  back  to  higher  education's  earliest  days  in  colonial  America.  In  this  dissertation,  I  draw  on  histories  of  American  politics,  higher  education,  ideas,  and  philosophy  to  make  two  core  arguments.  First,  I  demonstrate  that  the  emergence  of  civic  discourse  pedagogies  in  American  higher  education  has  followed  a  historical  pattern:  Societal  change  has  generated  new  visions  of  politics;  together  with  the  transformative  forces  that  shaped  them,  these  visions  have  led  to  new  conceptions  of  higher  education's  mission  and  new  ideas  about  the  kinds  of  citizens  higher  education  should  aim  to  produce.  These  conceptions  have  demanded  new  approaches  to  civic  education,  spurring  the  creation  of  new  ways  to  teach  civic  discourse.  Second,  I  argue  that  these  new  pedagogies  were  not  just  instructional  innovations.  Rather,  they  were  products  of  new  paradigms  of  civic  discourse  practice  and  pedagogy,  rooted  in  specific  notions  of  personhood,  power,  and  social  epistemology.  I  build  this  argument  by  analyzing  three  examples  of  pedagogical  emergence:  the  development  of  forensic  debate  in  the  mid-1700s;  deliberative  discussion  in  the  early  20th  century;  and  intergroup  dialogue  in  the  late  1980s.  These  models  of  pedagogical  emergence  and  paradigm  development  constitute  new  scholarly  contributions-ones  that  provide  analytical  tools  that  can  help  us  understand  and  reframe  our  contemporary  challenges  of  civic  discourse.  In  my  final  chapters,  I  demonstrate  this  point  by  applying  these  models  to  our  recent  history.  Ultimately,  my  hope  is  that  viewing  campus  civic  discourse  in  historical  perspective  can  support  the  vital  work  of  sustaining  conversations  across  difference  amid  the  critical  challenges  facing  higher  education  today.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0084.
■650  4▼aHigher  education
■650  4▼aEducation
■650  4▼aPedagogy
■653    ▼aCivic  discourse
■653    ▼aAmerican  politics
■653    ▼aPedagogical  emergence
■690    ▼a0745
■690    ▼a0515
■690    ▼a0456
■71020▼aHarvard  University▼bEducation.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g87-05A.
■790    ▼a0084
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2025
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17359439▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF16253 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.