서브메뉴
검색
Contingency in Leibniz's System of Philosophical Theology
Contingency in Leibniz's System of Philosophical Theology
Detailed Information
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103656
- ISBN
- 9798314890677
- DDC
- 100
- 서명/저자
- Contingency in Leibnizs System of Philosophical Theology
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : The Ohio State University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 133 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Downing, Lisa.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약I motivate a moral necessity interpretation of contingency-which maintains that there is some sense in which God could have done otherwise, even though it would involve a violation of the principle of sufficient reason-as the most promising source of contingency in Leibniz's system of philosophical theology. I then defend this interpretation against several objections, including objections from divine perfection and divine simplicity.
- 일반주제명
- Philosophy
- 일반주제명
- Philosophy of religion
- 일반주제명
- Theology
- 일반주제명
- Divinity
- 일반주제명
- Metaphysics
- 키워드
- Leibniz
- 키워드
- Modality
- 키워드
- Freedom
- 키워드
- Contingency
- 기타저자
- The Ohio State University Philosophy
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-11A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017358186
■00520260202103656
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798314890677
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32111918
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)OhioLINKosu174490625347
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a100
■1001 ▼aFlint, Dylan Isaac.
■24510▼aContingency in Leibniz's System of Philosophical Theology
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bThe Ohio State University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a133 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-11, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Downing, Lisa.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--The Ohio State University, 2025.
■520 ▼aI motivate a moral necessity interpretation of contingency-which maintains that there is some sense in which God could have done otherwise, even though it would involve a violation of the principle of sufficient reason-as the most promising source of contingency in Leibniz's system of philosophical theology. I then defend this interpretation against several objections, including objections from divine perfection and divine simplicity.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0168.
■650 4▼aPhilosophy
■650 4▼aPhilosophy of religion
■650 4▼aTheology
■650 4▼aDivinity
■650 4▼aMetaphysics
■653 ▼aLeibniz
■653 ▼aModality
■653 ▼aFreedom
■653 ▼aContingency
■653 ▼aDivine perfection
■690 ▼a0422
■690 ▼a0376
■690 ▼a0322
■690 ▼a0469
■690 ▼a0396
■71020▼aThe Ohio State University▼bPhilosophy.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-11A.
■790 ▼a0168
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17358186▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
Preview
Export
ChatGPT Discussion
AI Recommended Related Books
Подробнее информация.
- Бронирование
- не существует
- моя папка
- Первый запрос зрения
- Non-Book Loan Application
- Nighttime Book Loan Application
Books borrowed together with this book
Related Popular Books
Available after logging in.