본문

서브메뉴

Postcards or Porches, Close Friends or County Fairs: A New Theory of Political Participation Under Social Risk
Postcards or Porches, Close Friends or County Fairs: A New Theory of Political Participati...
Postcards or Porches, Close Friends or County Fairs: A New Theory of Political Participation Under Social Risk

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20260202105126
ISBN  
9798265410306
DDC  
320
저자명  
Manevich, Dorothy.
서명/저자  
Postcards or Porches, Close Friends or County Fairs: A New Theory of Political Participation Under Social Risk
발행사항  
[Sl] : Harvard University, 2025
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
형태사항  
225 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-05, Section: B.
주기사항  
Advisor: Enos, Ryan D.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2025.
초록/해제  
요약Social risk is inherent to political participation. Activists have difficult political conversations with the people they love. They knock on strangers' doors to persuade them to take political action. They protest in the streets, express their opinions on social media, and testify in public forums. All of these activities require self-revelation. Where the activist and their audience disagree, social alienation is possible, particularly in the contemporary American context where issue moralization and affective polarization are at their peak. Existing scholarship has focused exclusively on understanding how social risk helps locate people along a participatory continuum. According to this model, those who face high social risks participate "less" and those who face fewer social risks participate "more". This model is unnecessarily reductive and, in some cases, misleading. In this mixed methods dissertation, I propose a novel theory of political participation under social risk called the theory of selective participation. My theory asserts that as perceived social risk increases, people narrow the scope of audiences and activities they are willing to engage with. When people have consistent access to participatory opportunities within that narrowed scope, they can and do maintain high levels of participation. When they run out of opportunities within that narrowed scope, they participate less, consistent with previous scholarship. In this dissertation I also show that different types of social risk concerns create qualitatively different forms of political participation, producing the variety of participatory patterns we observe in the political world. Finally, I explain how people can become more or less selective in their participation over time through a dynamic response process that reacts to both their personal experiences and shifting social contexts.
일반주제명  
Political science
일반주제명  
Psychology
일반주제명  
Social work
일반주제명  
Social psychology
키워드  
Activism
키워드  
American politics
키워드  
Political behavior
키워드  
Political psychology
기타저자  
Harvard University Government
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-05B.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008260126s2025        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017359484
■00520260202105126
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798265410306
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32238766
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a320
■1001  ▼aManevich,  Dorothy.
■24510▼aPostcards  or  Porches,  Close  Friends  or  County  Fairs:  A  New  Theory  of  Political  Participation  Under  Social  Risk
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bHarvard  University▼c2025
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2025
■300    ▼a225  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  87-05,  Section:  B.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Enos,  Ryan  D.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--Harvard  University,  2025.
■520    ▼aSocial  risk  is  inherent  to  political  participation.  Activists  have  difficult  political  conversations  with  the  people  they  love.  They  knock  on  strangers'  doors  to  persuade  them  to  take  political  action.  They  protest  in  the  streets,  express  their  opinions  on  social  media,  and  testify  in  public  forums.  All  of  these  activities  require  self-revelation.  Where  the  activist  and  their  audience  disagree,  social  alienation  is  possible,  particularly  in  the  contemporary  American  context  where  issue  moralization  and  affective  polarization  are  at  their  peak.              Existing  scholarship  has  focused  exclusively  on  understanding  how  social  risk  helps  locate  people  along  a  participatory  continuum.  According  to  this  model,  those  who  face  high  social  risks  participate  "less"  and  those  who  face  fewer  social  risks  participate  "more".  This  model  is  unnecessarily  reductive  and,  in  some  cases,  misleading.  In  this  mixed  methods  dissertation,  I  propose  a  novel  theory  of  political  participation  under  social  risk  called  the  theory  of  selective  participation.  My  theory  asserts  that  as  perceived  social  risk  increases,  people  narrow  the  scope  of  audiences  and  activities  they  are  willing  to  engage  with.  When  people  have  consistent  access  to  participatory  opportunities  within  that  narrowed  scope,  they  can  and  do  maintain  high  levels  of  participation.  When  they  run  out  of  opportunities  within  that  narrowed  scope,  they  participate  less,  consistent  with  previous  scholarship.  In  this  dissertation  I  also  show  that  different  types  of  social  risk  concerns  create  qualitatively  different  forms  of  political  participation,  producing  the  variety  of  participatory  patterns  we  observe  in  the  political  world.  Finally,  I  explain  how  people  can  become  more  or  less  selective  in  their  participation  over  time  through  a  dynamic  response  process  that  reacts  to  both  their  personal  experiences  and  shifting  social  contexts.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0084.
■650  4▼aPolitical  science
■650  4▼aPsychology
■650  4▼aSocial  work
■650  4▼aSocial  psychology
■653    ▼aActivism
■653    ▼aAmerican  politics
■653    ▼aPolitical  behavior
■653    ▼aPolitical  psychology
■690    ▼a0615
■690    ▼a0621
■690    ▼a0451
■690    ▼a0452
■71020▼aHarvard  University▼bGovernment.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g87-05B.
■790    ▼a0084
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2025
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17359484▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF16454 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.