서브메뉴
검색
Clients' Assessment of Their Therapists' Dishonesty: A Mixed Methods Analysis
Clients' Assessment of Their Therapists' Dishonesty: A Mixed Methods Analysis
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202104728
- ISBN
- 9798290939094
- DDC
- 157
- 서명/저자
- Clients Assessment of Their Therapists Dishonesty: A Mixed Methods Analysis
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Columbia University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 167 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-02, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Farber, Barry.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Although honest communication is a crucial component of psychotherapy, previous research indicates that therapists, like most individuals, are occasionally dishonest in session. This study examined the topic of therapist dishonesty through the clients' perspective - a previously unexplored area of research. Specifically, the present study asked clients about instances where they perceived their therapists to be somewhat dishonest and how perceived therapist dishonesty might impact the client, the therapeutic relationship, and the process of therapy. Findings revealed that most clients perceive their therapists to be dishonest at least once over the course of therapy. Clients reported short-term negative effects on their emotions and engagement following the dishonesty, yet most clients did not confront their therapists about the suspected dishonesty. Clients reported minimal long-term impacts on the working alliance and overall opinions of the therapist. The vast majority of clients found occasional therapist dishonesty to be an acceptable practice when utilized in service of the client, the alliance, or professional boundaries. The perception of therapist dishonesty and its relationship to the working alliance, attachment styles, ruptures/repairs, and clinical tact is discussed. Directions for future research as well as implications for clinical training are discussed.
- 일반주제명
- Clinical psychology
- 일반주제명
- Medical ethics
- 일반주제명
- Therapy
- 일반주제명
- Counseling psychology
- 키워드
- Non-disclosure
- 키워드
- Self-disclosure
- 키워드
- Working alliance
- 기타저자
- Columbia University TC: Clinical Psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-02A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017358623
■00520260202104728
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798290939094
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32122633
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a157
■1001 ▼aCrumb, Catherine E.
■24510▼aClients' Assessment of Their Therapists' Dishonesty: A Mixed Methods Analysis
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bColumbia University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a167 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-02, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Farber, Barry.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2025.
■520 ▼aAlthough honest communication is a crucial component of psychotherapy, previous research indicates that therapists, like most individuals, are occasionally dishonest in session. This study examined the topic of therapist dishonesty through the clients' perspective - a previously unexplored area of research. Specifically, the present study asked clients about instances where they perceived their therapists to be somewhat dishonest and how perceived therapist dishonesty might impact the client, the therapeutic relationship, and the process of therapy. Findings revealed that most clients perceive their therapists to be dishonest at least once over the course of therapy. Clients reported short-term negative effects on their emotions and engagement following the dishonesty, yet most clients did not confront their therapists about the suspected dishonesty. Clients reported minimal long-term impacts on the working alliance and overall opinions of the therapist. The vast majority of clients found occasional therapist dishonesty to be an acceptable practice when utilized in service of the client, the alliance, or professional boundaries. The perception of therapist dishonesty and its relationship to the working alliance, attachment styles, ruptures/repairs, and clinical tact is discussed. Directions for future research as well as implications for clinical training are discussed.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0054.
■650 4▼aClinical psychology
■650 4▼aMedical ethics
■650 4▼aTherapy
■650 4▼aCounseling psychology
■653 ▼aClient perceptions
■653 ▼aNon-disclosure
■653 ▼aSelf-disclosure
■653 ▼aTherapeutic relationship
■653 ▼aTherapist dishonesty
■653 ▼aWorking alliance
■690 ▼a0622
■690 ▼a0497
■690 ▼a0212
■690 ▼a0603
■690 ▼a0769
■71020▼aColumbia University▼bTC: Clinical Psychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-02A.
■790 ▼a0054
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17358623▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
