본문

서브메뉴

Inimicitiae in Tacitus
Inimicitiae in Tacitus
Inimicitiae in Tacitus

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20260202105828
ISBN  
9798265453044
DDC  
880
저자명  
Rudman, Nicholas Arthur.
서명/저자  
Inimicitiae in Tacitus
발행사항  
[Sl] : University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2024
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2024
형태사항  
253 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-06, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Walters, Brian.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2024.
초록/해제  
요약This dissertation analyzes the depiction of personal feuding, or inimicitiae, within Tacitus' historical works. Said analysis is grounded in passages from Tacitus' Dialogus de Oratoribus which imply that the ability to regulate feuding among citizens is a key means of evaluating a system of government and that the Roman republic collapsed because it failed to do so. Accordingly, Tacitus' portrayal of enmity serves as a means of illuminating his depiction of the principate. I begin by reconstructing early 2nd-century C.E. beliefs concerning republican feuding through analyzing the work of Tacitus, his contemporaries, and earlier literature that likely influenced the historian's thought. I also demonstrate that Tacitus' emperors strive to present themselves as controlling the harmful effects of inimicitiae, even if they do not always live up to this ideal. The second chapter focuses on feuding over the imperial succession, arguing that the question of choosing the next ruler produced endless fights over power resembling those that destroyed the republic. My third chapter examines feuds that do not involve the imperial family directly and demonstrates that while the change in governments did alter the ways in which elite Romans conducted inimicitiae, said changes did not make feuding less dangerous and opened new opportunities for enemies to use the legal system against one another. Finally, I conclude by discussing reconciliation in Tacitus, contending that the historian shows that the emperors genuinely could act as "reconcilers-in-chief" who settled the feuds of their subjects, but that in practice, they more often abuse this role to protect their corrupt underlings. These points build to the main conclusion, namely that in Tacitus' presentation, the changes to the nature of inimicitiae brought about by the emperors hardly solved the problem of feuding. This aligns with recent scholarly trends arguing that Tacitus does not present a solution to any issue, but rather prompts his audience to consider the strengths and weaknesses of different alternatives.
일반주제명  
Classical literature
일반주제명  
Language
일반주제명  
History
일반주제명  
Literature
키워드  
Latin literature
키워드  
Imperial literature
키워드  
Historiography
키워드  
Tacitus
키워드  
Enmity
키워드  
Interpersonal conflict
기타저자  
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Classics
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-06A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008260126s2024        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017361297
■00520260202105828
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798265453044
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32409642
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)124517
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a880
■1001  ▼aRudman,  Nicholas  Arthur.
■24510▼aInimicitiae  in  Tacitus
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity  of  Illinois  at  Urbana-Champaign▼c2024
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2024
■300    ▼a253  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  87-06,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Walters,  Brian.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  Illinois  at  Urbana-Champaign,  2024.
■520    ▼aThis  dissertation  analyzes  the  depiction  of  personal  feuding,  or  inimicitiae,  within  Tacitus'  historical  works.  Said  analysis  is  grounded  in  passages  from  Tacitus'  Dialogus  de  Oratoribus  which  imply  that  the  ability  to  regulate  feuding  among  citizens  is  a  key  means  of  evaluating  a  system  of  government  and  that  the  Roman  republic  collapsed  because  it  failed  to  do  so.  Accordingly,  Tacitus'  portrayal  of  enmity  serves  as  a  means  of  illuminating  his  depiction  of  the  principate.  I  begin  by  reconstructing  early  2nd-century  C.E.  beliefs  concerning  republican  feuding  through  analyzing  the  work  of  Tacitus,  his  contemporaries,  and  earlier  literature  that  likely  influenced  the  historian's  thought.  I  also  demonstrate  that  Tacitus'  emperors  strive  to  present  themselves  as  controlling  the  harmful  effects  of  inimicitiae,  even  if  they  do  not  always  live  up  to  this  ideal.  The  second  chapter  focuses  on  feuding  over  the  imperial  succession,  arguing  that  the  question  of  choosing  the  next  ruler  produced  endless  fights  over  power  resembling  those  that  destroyed  the  republic.  My  third  chapter  examines  feuds  that  do  not  involve  the  imperial  family  directly  and  demonstrates  that  while  the  change  in  governments  did  alter  the  ways  in  which  elite  Romans  conducted  inimicitiae,  said  changes  did  not  make  feuding  less  dangerous  and  opened  new  opportunities  for  enemies  to  use  the  legal  system  against  one  another.  Finally,  I  conclude  by  discussing  reconciliation  in  Tacitus,  contending  that  the  historian  shows  that  the  emperors  genuinely  could  act  as  "reconcilers-in-chief"  who  settled  the  feuds  of  their  subjects,  but  that  in  practice,  they  more  often  abuse  this  role  to  protect  their  corrupt  underlings.  These  points  build  to  the  main  conclusion,  namely  that  in  Tacitus'  presentation,  the  changes  to  the  nature  of  inimicitiae  brought  about  by  the  emperors  hardly  solved  the  problem  of  feuding.  This  aligns  with  recent  scholarly  trends  arguing  that  Tacitus  does  not  present  a  solution  to  any  issue,  but  rather  prompts  his  audience  to  consider  the  strengths  and  weaknesses  of  different  alternatives.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0090.
■650  4▼aClassical  literature
■650  4▼aLanguage
■650  4▼aHistory
■650  4▼aLiterature
■653    ▼aLatin  literature
■653    ▼aImperial  literature
■653    ▼aHistoriography
■653    ▼aTacitus
■653    ▼aEnmity
■653    ▼aInterpersonal  conflict
■690    ▼a0294
■690    ▼a0401
■690    ▼a0679
■690    ▼a0578
■71020▼aUniversity  of  Illinois  at  Urbana-Champaign▼bClassics.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g87-06A.
■790    ▼a0090
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2024
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17361297▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF17589 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.