서브메뉴
검색
Governing Emerging Climate Intervention Technologies: Engagement and Justice in the Case of Solar Geoengineering
Governing Emerging Climate Intervention Technologies: Engagement and Justice in the Case of Solar Geoengineering
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202104638
- ISBN
- 9798288887727
- DDC
- 550
- 저자명
- Dove, Zachary.
- 서명/저자
- Governing Emerging Climate Intervention Technologies: Engagement and Justice in the Case of Solar Geoengineering
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of California, Santa Cruz, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 348 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-01, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Jinnah, Sikina.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Attention has turned towards different forms of climate intervention as potential response options to complement - not replace - mitigation. This dissertation focuses on solar geoengineering as one case of an emerging climate intervention technology. Solar geoengineering as a is a set of proposed technologies that would aim to limit climate impacts by reflecting incoming sunlight back into space, thereby cooling the planet. The risks, uncertainties, and challenges associated with solar geoengineering necessitate governance of its research and engagement with publics and other interested groups around the world in discussion, research, and decision-making. This dissertation focuses on engagement as one form of governance that has thus far been overlooked in analysis of climate intervention governance. A dominant perspective in the global governance literature views attempts to broaden engagement as a legitimation practice. And yet, this dissertation shows that under certain conditions, engagement can take on a variety of forms and be practiced in more varied ways than expected. Engagement can be both a means of legitimation and a tool that empowers actors to substantively shape research and decision-making. This dissertation aims to can advance our understanding of how engagement is used to govern climate intervention research and the conditions under which it legitimates actors and their interests or empowers specific actors to challenge, constrain, enable, produce, or otherwise shape research. It also aims to better understand the justice implications of using engagement as a form of governance. Using interviews, document analysis, and review research methods, the dissertation pursues these aims across three interrelated forms of engagement that are used to govern research of climate intervention technologies: invited engagement, perspectives research, and capacity building programs. All three forms of engagement can be employed by an authoritative actor to govern, a phenomenon the dissertation labels governance by engagement. Governance by engagement refers to authoritative efforts to initiate engagement practices in order to influence or steer a target audience's behavior or otherwise shape research or decision-making towards public goals. The concept applies broadly, as engagement is commonly practiced across a range public policy domains.Overall, this dissertation leverages original empirical analysis, theoretical insights, and novel conceptual and analytical tools to show that engagement practices should be understood and studied as a potential form of governance, which focuses attention on how engagement can shape political outcomes by producing governance effects. It can do so by normalizing research; by broadening the actors and values, perspectives, and knowledge involved in discussion, research, and decision-making; and by generating novel actors with particular identities and capacities. These insights are crucial as engagement plays a central and often taken-for-granted role in efforts to govern emerging technologies, as engagement is a double-edged sword: it can both contribute to and undermine our ability to govern in just and effective ways. The dissertation can inform how decision-makers, researchers, and practitioners use engagement to govern research into climate intervention technologies, emerging technologies, and other pressing issues.
- 일반주제명
- Environmental studies
- 일반주제명
- Political science
- 일반주제명
- Alternative energy
- 키워드
- Governance
- 키워드
- Justice
- 기타저자
- University of California, Santa Cruz Politics
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-01B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017358285
■00520260202104638
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798288887727
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32113603
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a550
■1001 ▼aDove, Zachary.▼0(orcid)0000-0001-5003-5875
■24510▼aGoverning Emerging Climate Intervention Technologies: Engagement and Justice in the Case of Solar Geoengineering
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of California, Santa Cruz▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a348 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-01, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Jinnah, Sikina.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Santa Cruz, 2025.
■520 ▼aAttention has turned towards different forms of climate intervention as potential response options to complement - not replace - mitigation. This dissertation focuses on solar geoengineering as one case of an emerging climate intervention technology. Solar geoengineering as a is a set of proposed technologies that would aim to limit climate impacts by reflecting incoming sunlight back into space, thereby cooling the planet. The risks, uncertainties, and challenges associated with solar geoengineering necessitate governance of its research and engagement with publics and other interested groups around the world in discussion, research, and decision-making. This dissertation focuses on engagement as one form of governance that has thus far been overlooked in analysis of climate intervention governance. A dominant perspective in the global governance literature views attempts to broaden engagement as a legitimation practice. And yet, this dissertation shows that under certain conditions, engagement can take on a variety of forms and be practiced in more varied ways than expected. Engagement can be both a means of legitimation and a tool that empowers actors to substantively shape research and decision-making. This dissertation aims to can advance our understanding of how engagement is used to govern climate intervention research and the conditions under which it legitimates actors and their interests or empowers specific actors to challenge, constrain, enable, produce, or otherwise shape research. It also aims to better understand the justice implications of using engagement as a form of governance. Using interviews, document analysis, and review research methods, the dissertation pursues these aims across three interrelated forms of engagement that are used to govern research of climate intervention technologies: invited engagement, perspectives research, and capacity building programs. All three forms of engagement can be employed by an authoritative actor to govern, a phenomenon the dissertation labels governance by engagement. Governance by engagement refers to authoritative efforts to initiate engagement practices in order to influence or steer a target audience's behavior or otherwise shape research or decision-making towards public goals. The concept applies broadly, as engagement is commonly practiced across a range public policy domains.Overall, this dissertation leverages original empirical analysis, theoretical insights, and novel conceptual and analytical tools to show that engagement practices should be understood and studied as a potential form of governance, which focuses attention on how engagement can shape political outcomes by producing governance effects. It can do so by normalizing research; by broadening the actors and values, perspectives, and knowledge involved in discussion, research, and decision-making; and by generating novel actors with particular identities and capacities. These insights are crucial as engagement plays a central and often taken-for-granted role in efforts to govern emerging technologies, as engagement is a double-edged sword: it can both contribute to and undermine our ability to govern in just and effective ways. The dissertation can inform how decision-makers, researchers, and practitioners use engagement to govern research into climate intervention technologies, emerging technologies, and other pressing issues.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0036.
■650 4▼aEnvironmental studies
■650 4▼aPolitical science
■650 4▼aAlternative energy
■653 ▼aClimate intervention
■653 ▼aGovernance
■653 ▼aJustice
■653 ▼aPublic engagement
■653 ▼aSolar geoengineering
■653 ▼aSolar radiation management
■690 ▼a0477
■690 ▼a0615
■690 ▼a0474
■690 ▼a0363
■71020▼aUniversity of California, Santa Cruz▼bPolitics.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-01B.
■790 ▼a0036
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17358285▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.


