본문

서브메뉴

Cow Power: Governing Dairy Methane Emissions in California
Cow Power: Governing Dairy Methane Emissions in California
Cow Power: Governing Dairy Methane Emissions in California

상세정보

자료유형  
 학위논문 서양
최종처리일시  
20260202103542
ISBN  
9798290647425
DDC  
550
저자명  
Castner, Elizabeth A.
서명/저자  
Cow Power: Governing Dairy Methane Emissions in California
발행사항  
[Sl] : University of California, Davis, 2025
발행사항  
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
형태사항  
199 p
주기사항  
Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-01, Section: A.
주기사항  
Advisor: Spang, Edward S.
학위논문주기  
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Davis, 2025.
초록/해제  
요약Addressing climate change requires strong policy initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across economic sectors. Agricultural GHG emissions are rarely regulated but are increasingly a focus of scientific and policy work. Agricultural sources present challenges to existing climate governance frameworks for several reasons: the spatial and temporal variations in emissions from farms make measurement, and thus management, difficult; technologies for emissions reductions are nascent and require further study on the effects of their implementation; and the existing financial and physical infrastructures of the US food system are resistant to change. Given these challenges, what types of policy are needed to address agricultural emissions and what types of barriers to implementation exist? More broadly, what types of climate policy are possible in the current political economy of US food systems?The state of California implemented legislation in 2016 mandating reductions in GHG emissions from agricultural sources, and in particular from the state's highly developed dairy industry. State incentives prioritizes the implementation of anaerobic digesters, which capture methane from dairy manure and produce biogas to be used as an energy source. This dissertation examines the implementation of California's unique approach to reducing dairy GHG emissions as a case study of climate policy for agriculture. A mixed-methods approach is informed by political ecology, industrial ecology, and critical food system studies. First, an examination of political discourses that question the legitimacy of state carbon calculations shows how modeling assumptions render dairy biogas renewable and reflect power asymmetries between industry and environmental groups. Second, a counterfactual Life Cycle Assessment of the environmental impacts of dairy biogas extends the scope used by the state's model to include emissions from dairy production. Allocation-based LCA modeling provide a more complete picture of the fuel's life cycle emissions and shows how GHG emissions from dairy systems may be considered for fuels derived from dairy manure. Third, a survey of California dairy operators examines respondents' perceptions and willingness to adopt climate technologies in relation to their current scale of production and management choices. Analysis of survey results hypothesizes that anaerobic digesters could exacerbate existing economic pressures on dairy operations by operating as a green version of the agricultural technology treadmill.California's case shows that climate governance faces significant barriers due to the concentration, consolidation and intensification of the agriculture sector. This is due in part to the industry's political influence, but also because agricultural treadmill dynamics make changes in farm management for purpose of mitigating GHG emissions difficult to implement. Successful climate policy for agriculture should address both the political and economic structures that shape our current food system.
일반주제명  
Environmental studies
일반주제명  
Agriculture
일반주제명  
Political science
키워드  
Agricultural technology treadmill
키워드  
Climate metrics
키워드  
Climate policy
키워드  
Dairy industry
키워드  
Life Cycle Assessment
키워드  
Political economy
기타저자  
University of California, Davis Geography
기본자료저록  
Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-01A.
전자적 위치 및 접속  
로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.

MARC

 008260126s2025        us                              c    eng  d
■001000017357656
■00520260202103542
■006m          o    d                
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020    ▼a9798290647425
■035    ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32040980
■040    ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820  ▼a550
■1001  ▼aCastner,  Elizabeth  A.
■24510▼aCow  Power:  Governing  Dairy  Methane  Emissions  in  California
■260    ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity  of  California,  Davis▼c2025
■260  1▼aAnn  Arbor▼bProQuest  Dissertations  &  Theses▼c2025
■300    ▼a199  p
■500    ▼aSource:  Dissertations  Abstracts  International,  Volume:  87-01,  Section:  A.
■500    ▼aAdvisor:  Spang,  Edward  S.
■5021  ▼aThesis  (Ph.D.)--University  of  California,  Davis,  2025.
■520    ▼aAddressing  climate  change  requires  strong  policy  initiatives  to  reduce  greenhouse  gas  (GHG)  emissions  across  economic  sectors.  Agricultural  GHG  emissions  are  rarely  regulated  but  are  increasingly  a  focus  of  scientific  and  policy  work.  Agricultural  sources  present  challenges  to  existing  climate  governance  frameworks  for  several  reasons:  the  spatial  and  temporal  variations  in  emissions  from  farms  make  measurement,  and  thus  management,  difficult;  technologies  for  emissions  reductions  are  nascent  and  require  further  study  on  the  effects  of  their  implementation;  and  the  existing  financial  and  physical  infrastructures  of  the  US  food  system  are  resistant  to  change.  Given  these  challenges,  what  types  of  policy  are  needed  to  address  agricultural  emissions  and  what  types  of  barriers  to  implementation  exist?  More  broadly,  what  types  of  climate  policy  are  possible  in  the  current  political  economy  of  US  food  systems?The  state  of  California  implemented  legislation  in  2016  mandating  reductions  in  GHG  emissions  from  agricultural  sources,  and  in  particular  from  the  state's  highly  developed  dairy  industry.  State  incentives  prioritizes  the  implementation  of  anaerobic  digesters,  which  capture  methane  from  dairy  manure  and  produce  biogas  to  be  used  as  an  energy  source.  This  dissertation  examines  the  implementation  of  California's  unique  approach  to  reducing  dairy  GHG  emissions  as  a  case  study  of  climate  policy  for  agriculture.  A  mixed-methods  approach  is  informed  by  political  ecology,  industrial  ecology,  and  critical  food  system  studies.  First,  an  examination  of  political  discourses  that  question  the  legitimacy  of  state  carbon  calculations  shows  how  modeling  assumptions  render  dairy  biogas  renewable  and  reflect  power  asymmetries  between  industry  and  environmental  groups.  Second,  a  counterfactual  Life  Cycle  Assessment  of  the  environmental  impacts  of  dairy  biogas  extends  the  scope  used  by  the  state's  model  to  include  emissions  from  dairy  production.  Allocation-based  LCA  modeling  provide  a  more  complete  picture  of  the  fuel's  life  cycle  emissions  and  shows  how  GHG  emissions  from  dairy  systems  may  be  considered  for  fuels  derived  from  dairy  manure.  Third,  a  survey  of  California  dairy  operators  examines  respondents'  perceptions  and  willingness  to  adopt  climate  technologies  in  relation  to  their  current  scale  of  production  and  management  choices.  Analysis  of  survey  results  hypothesizes  that  anaerobic  digesters  could  exacerbate  existing  economic  pressures  on  dairy  operations  by  operating  as  a  green  version  of  the  agricultural  technology  treadmill.California's  case  shows  that  climate  governance  faces  significant  barriers  due  to  the  concentration,  consolidation  and  intensification  of  the  agriculture  sector.  This  is  due  in  part  to  the  industry's  political  influence,  but  also  because  agricultural  treadmill  dynamics  make  changes  in  farm  management  for  purpose  of  mitigating  GHG  emissions  difficult  to  implement.  Successful  climate  policy  for  agriculture  should  address  both  the  political  and  economic  structures  that  shape  our  current  food  system.
■590    ▼aSchool  code:  0029.
■650  4▼aEnvironmental  studies
■650  4▼aAgriculture
■650  4▼aPolitical  science
■653    ▼aAgricultural  technology  treadmill
■653    ▼aClimate  metrics
■653    ▼aClimate  policy
■653    ▼aDairy  industry
■653    ▼aLife  Cycle  Assessment
■653    ▼aPolitical  economy
■690    ▼a0477
■690    ▼a0474
■690    ▼a0473
■690    ▼a0615
■71020▼aUniversity  of  California,  Davis▼bGeography.
■7730  ▼tDissertations  Abstracts  International▼g87-01A.
■790    ▼a0029
■791    ▼aPh.D.
■792    ▼a2025
■793    ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17357656▼nKERIS▼z이  자료의  원문은  한국교육학술정보원에서  제공합니다.

미리보기

내보내기

chatGPT토론

Ai 추천 관련 도서


    신착도서 더보기
    최근 3년간 통계입니다.

    소장정보

    • 예약
    • 소재불명신고
    • 나의폴더
    • 우선정리요청
    • 비도서대출신청
    • 야간 도서대출신청
    소장자료
    등록번호 청구기호 소장처 대출가능여부 대출정보
    TF18426 전자도서 대출가능 마이폴더 부재도서신고 비도서대출신청 야간 도서대출신청

    * 대출중인 자료에 한하여 예약이 가능합니다. 예약을 원하시면 예약버튼을 클릭하십시오.

    해당 도서를 다른 이용자가 함께 대출한 도서

    관련 인기도서

    로그인 후 이용 가능합니다.