서브메뉴
검색
Analogy and Anomaly in the Continental Renaissance: An Intellectual History
Analogy and Anomaly in the Continental Renaissance: An Intellectual History
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103545
- ISBN
- 9798280712157
- DDC
- 820
- 저자명
- Zanelli, Andrew.
- 서명/저자
- Analogy and Anomaly in the Continental Renaissance: An Intellectual History
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Harvard University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 233 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Whittington, Leah;Coleman, Kathleen.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약This dissertation explores the tension between analogy and anomaly-two foundational concepts deriving from ancient grammatical and rhetorical traditions-and traces their intellectual afterlife in the Continental Renaissance. Focusing on the reintroduction and reinterpretation of these concepts by Petrarch, Bruni, and Montaigne, this dissertation argues that Renaissance humanists internalized ancient linguistic theory to negotiate evolving notions of authorship, language, and exemplarity. Through detailed case studies, it examines how Varro's De lingua latina and Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria influenced Renaissance thinkers in their effort to reconcile classical models with historico-linguistic subjectivity. Petrarch's poetry enacts anomaly through iterative formal innovation; Bruni redefines translation theory by rejecting strict verbal equivalence in favor of sense and idiom; and Montaigne reorients language and thought around the idiosyncrasies of subjectivity, dissolving classical paradigms. Ultimately, the project reframes analogy and anomaly not merely as grammatical terms but as organizing principles for literary composition and intellectual identity. It reveals how the Renaissance humanist movement, often seen as paradigmatic in its return to antiquity, was also deeply engaged in conceptualizing rupture, irregularity, and linguistic historicism-thus offering a new model of how early modern authors situated themselves within, and against, inherited norms.
- 일반주제명
- English literature
- 일반주제명
- Classical literature
- 일반주제명
- History
- 일반주제명
- Linguistics
- 기타저자
- Harvard University English
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-12A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017357675
■00520260202103545
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798280712157
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32041171
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a820
■1001 ▼aZanelli, Andrew.▼0(orcid)0000-0002-3545-2782
■24510▼aAnalogy and Anomaly in the Continental Renaissance: An Intellectual History
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bHarvard University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a233 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Whittington, Leah;Coleman, Kathleen.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 2025.
■520 ▼aThis dissertation explores the tension between analogy and anomaly-two foundational concepts deriving from ancient grammatical and rhetorical traditions-and traces their intellectual afterlife in the Continental Renaissance. Focusing on the reintroduction and reinterpretation of these concepts by Petrarch, Bruni, and Montaigne, this dissertation argues that Renaissance humanists internalized ancient linguistic theory to negotiate evolving notions of authorship, language, and exemplarity. Through detailed case studies, it examines how Varro's De lingua latina and Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria influenced Renaissance thinkers in their effort to reconcile classical models with historico-linguistic subjectivity. Petrarch's poetry enacts anomaly through iterative formal innovation; Bruni redefines translation theory by rejecting strict verbal equivalence in favor of sense and idiom; and Montaigne reorients language and thought around the idiosyncrasies of subjectivity, dissolving classical paradigms. Ultimately, the project reframes analogy and anomaly not merely as grammatical terms but as organizing principles for literary composition and intellectual identity. It reveals how the Renaissance humanist movement, often seen as paradigmatic in its return to antiquity, was also deeply engaged in conceptualizing rupture, irregularity, and linguistic historicism-thus offering a new model of how early modern authors situated themselves within, and against, inherited norms.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0084.
■650 4▼aEnglish literature
■650 4▼aClassical literature
■650 4▼aBritish & Irish literature
■650 4▼aHistory
■650 4▼aLinguistics
■653 ▼aContinental Renaissance
■653 ▼aIntellectual identity
■653 ▼aRhetorical traditions
■690 ▼a0593
■690 ▼a0294
■690 ▼a0290
■690 ▼a0578
■71020▼aHarvard University▼bEnglish.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-12A.
■790 ▼a0084
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17357675▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
