서브메뉴
검색
Mind Your Measures and Mechanisms: Adjudicating Normative Influence on Adolescent Delinquency Through Meta-Analysis
Mind Your Measures and Mechanisms: Adjudicating Normative Influence on Adolescent Delinquency Through Meta-Analysis
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202105314
- ISBN
- 9798270234140
- DDC
- 364
- 서명/저자
- Mind Your Measures and Mechanisms: Adjudicating Normative Influence on Adolescent Delinquency Through Meta-Analysis
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Indiana University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 380 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-06, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Brauer, Jonathan R.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약This dissertation presents the results of meta-analyses examining associations between parental, friend, or general peer social norms and adolescent delinquency outcomes. One primary goal was to identify overlaps in the conceptualization and measurement of referent social norms in the fields of criminology and social psychology. Specifically, the theories of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior alongside various criminological theories related to Social Learning, Control, and Symbolic Interactionism were examined. Then, multilevel random effects meta-analyses of empirical studies from these disciplinary areas sought to answer the following research questions: 1) What are the meta-analytic average associations of parents', friends' and peers' injunctive and descriptive norms on adolescent delinquent behaviors?; 2) Do such correlations vary significantly across norm type (injunctive, descriptive, or "pressure") or referent sources (parent, friend, or generalized peers)?; 3) Do such correlations significantly vary across types of delinquency?; 4) Do such correlations vary across measurement specificity and compatibility?; 5) Do such correlations vary across temporal dimensions of study data sources?; and 6) Do such correlations vary across publication status? Meta-analytic results based on 1,674 effect sizes from 355 studies reveal an overall referent social norm association of r = 0.279 (95% CI [0.256, 0.301]). There was little, non-significant variation found for overall norm type meta-averaged associations, indicating that injunctive and descriptive norms produce mean effects similar in magnitude. Regarding norm source, friend and peer norms were found to produce significantly higher meta-averaged correlations compared to parent norms. Social norm correlations were found to be largest for more common or less-serious types of delinquency (e.g., related to traffic and cyber behaviors) compared to more serious, socially stigmatized types of delinquency (e.g., sex and weapon categories). Studies employing specific norm measures were found to produce larger average correlations compared to study employing general measures, though the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, mean effect estimates were found to be significantly larger from studies employing compatible vs. non-compatible norm/behavior measures. Average correlations from studies utilizing concurrent data were found to be significantly larger than those utilizing longitudinal data. Finally, published and non-published studies were found to produce average correlations similar in magnitude.
- 일반주제명
- Criminology
- 일반주제명
- Law enforcement
- 일반주제명
- Social psychology
- 키워드
- Adolescent
- 키워드
- Crime
- 키워드
- Delinquency
- 키워드
- Meta-analysis
- 키워드
- Quantitative
- 키워드
- Youth
- 기타저자
- Indiana University Criminal Justice
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-06B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017360167
■00520260202105314
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798270234140
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32285824
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a364
■1001 ▼aFarrell, Mitchell.
■24510▼aMind Your Measures and Mechanisms: Adjudicating Normative Influence on Adolescent Delinquency Through Meta-Analysis
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bIndiana University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a380 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-06, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Brauer, Jonathan R.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--Indiana University, 2025.
■520 ▼aThis dissertation presents the results of meta-analyses examining associations between parental, friend, or general peer social norms and adolescent delinquency outcomes. One primary goal was to identify overlaps in the conceptualization and measurement of referent social norms in the fields of criminology and social psychology. Specifically, the theories of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior alongside various criminological theories related to Social Learning, Control, and Symbolic Interactionism were examined. Then, multilevel random effects meta-analyses of empirical studies from these disciplinary areas sought to answer the following research questions: 1) What are the meta-analytic average associations of parents', friends' and peers' injunctive and descriptive norms on adolescent delinquent behaviors?; 2) Do such correlations vary significantly across norm type (injunctive, descriptive, or "pressure") or referent sources (parent, friend, or generalized peers)?; 3) Do such correlations significantly vary across types of delinquency?; 4) Do such correlations vary across measurement specificity and compatibility?; 5) Do such correlations vary across temporal dimensions of study data sources?; and 6) Do such correlations vary across publication status? Meta-analytic results based on 1,674 effect sizes from 355 studies reveal an overall referent social norm association of r = 0.279 (95% CI [0.256, 0.301]). There was little, non-significant variation found for overall norm type meta-averaged associations, indicating that injunctive and descriptive norms produce mean effects similar in magnitude. Regarding norm source, friend and peer norms were found to produce significantly higher meta-averaged correlations compared to parent norms. Social norm correlations were found to be largest for more common or less-serious types of delinquency (e.g., related to traffic and cyber behaviors) compared to more serious, socially stigmatized types of delinquency (e.g., sex and weapon categories). Studies employing specific norm measures were found to produce larger average correlations compared to study employing general measures, though the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, mean effect estimates were found to be significantly larger from studies employing compatible vs. non-compatible norm/behavior measures. Average correlations from studies utilizing concurrent data were found to be significantly larger than those utilizing longitudinal data. Finally, published and non-published studies were found to produce average correlations similar in magnitude.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0093.
■650 4▼aCriminology
■650 4▼aLaw enforcement
■650 4▼aSocial psychology
■653 ▼aAdolescent
■653 ▼aCrime
■653 ▼aDelinquency
■653 ▼aMeta-analysis
■653 ▼aQuantitative
■653 ▼aYouth
■690 ▼a0627
■690 ▼a0206
■690 ▼a0451
■71020▼aIndiana University▼bCriminal Justice.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-06B.
■790 ▼a0093
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17360167▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.


