서브메뉴
검색
Predicting Penalties and Rewards for Counter-Stereotypic Behaviors: Development and Testing of a Unified Theory of Gender Norm Violations
Predicting Penalties and Rewards for Counter-Stereotypic Behaviors: Development and Testing of a Unified Theory of Gender Norm Violations
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202103058
- ISBN
- 9798286423828
- DDC
- 301.1
- 서명/저자
- Predicting Penalties and Rewards for Counter-Stereotypic Behaviors: Development and Testing of a Unified Theory of Gender Norm Violations
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : New York University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 194 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Heilman, Madeline E.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약Gender stereotypes shape behavioral expectations, and individuals who violate these expectations are sometimes penalized, and other times rewarded. Role congruity theories, status incongruity hypothesis, and expectancy violation theory are all used to predict and explain reactions to gender norm violations, yet none fully account for the patterns of reactions observed in past research. This dissertation develops and tests a unified theoretical model that helps resolve the inconsistencies observed in past empirical studies. In it, I evaluate the assumptions the model makes about behavior expectedness and desirability and test the model's ability to predict reactions to men and women engaging in counter-stereotypic behaviors in novel experimental paradigms. While we find some evidence to support the model's predictions of rewards for counter-stereotypic behaviors, the results do not support the model's predictions regarding penalties, nor do they provide evidence for existing theories that predict backlash against counter-stereotypic individuals. Instead, we find evidence that men and women who engage in negative, counter-stereotypic behaviors are penalized similarly or less harshly than individuals who engage in negative, gender-stereotypic behaviors. These findings challenge prevailing theories of reactions to gender norm violations and suggest that, in some cases, conforming to gendered expectations is penalized more strongly than violating them. This research underscores the need for further theoretical development to accurately predict and explain responses to gender norm violations.
- 일반주제명
- Social psychology
- 일반주제명
- Psychology
- 일반주제명
- Gender studies
- 키워드
- Gender bias
- 키워드
- Gender norms
- 키워드
- Role congruity
- 기타저자
- New York University Psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 86-12A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017356901
■00520260202103058
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798286423828
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI31933486
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a301.1
■1001 ▼aEareckson, Hannah B.
■24510▼aPredicting Penalties and Rewards for Counter-Stereotypic Behaviors: Development and Testing of a Unified Theory of Gender Norm Violations
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bNew York University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a194 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-12, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Heilman, Madeline E.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2025.
■520 ▼aGender stereotypes shape behavioral expectations, and individuals who violate these expectations are sometimes penalized, and other times rewarded. Role congruity theories, status incongruity hypothesis, and expectancy violation theory are all used to predict and explain reactions to gender norm violations, yet none fully account for the patterns of reactions observed in past research. This dissertation develops and tests a unified theoretical model that helps resolve the inconsistencies observed in past empirical studies. In it, I evaluate the assumptions the model makes about behavior expectedness and desirability and test the model's ability to predict reactions to men and women engaging in counter-stereotypic behaviors in novel experimental paradigms. While we find some evidence to support the model's predictions of rewards for counter-stereotypic behaviors, the results do not support the model's predictions regarding penalties, nor do they provide evidence for existing theories that predict backlash against counter-stereotypic individuals. Instead, we find evidence that men and women who engage in negative, counter-stereotypic behaviors are penalized similarly or less harshly than individuals who engage in negative, gender-stereotypic behaviors. These findings challenge prevailing theories of reactions to gender norm violations and suggest that, in some cases, conforming to gendered expectations is penalized more strongly than violating them. This research underscores the need for further theoretical development to accurately predict and explain responses to gender norm violations.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0146.
■650 4▼aSocial psychology
■650 4▼aPsychology
■650 4▼aGender studies
■653 ▼aExpectancy violation theory
■653 ▼aGender bias
■653 ▼aGender norms
■653 ▼aRole congruity
■653 ▼aStatus incongruity
■653 ▼aStereotype violations
■690 ▼a0451
■690 ▼a0621
■690 ▼a0733
■71020▼aNew York University▼bPsychology.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g86-12A.
■790 ▼a0146
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17356901▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
