서브메뉴
검색
The Spillover of Violence: Its Effect on Third-Party Observers
The Spillover of Violence: Its Effect on Third-Party Observers
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202105148
- ISBN
- 9798293825813
- DDC
- 320
- 저자명
- Wu, Zhiqian.
- 서명/저자
- The Spillover of Violence: Its Effect on Third-Party Observers
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : University of California, Los Angeles, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 227 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Stein, Arthur A.;Min, Eric A.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약This dissertation develops a two-dimensional typology to explain how third-party observer states respond to foreign aggression. It argues that such responses are shaped by the interaction of two distinct drivers: empathetic identification with the victim and perceived existential threat from the perpetrator. Drawing on cases of China's repression in Hong Kong and Xinjiang (2019) and Russia's interventions in Georgia (2008), Crimea (2014), and Ukraine (2022), the analysis demonstrates that this framework consistently predicts variation in a third-party observer's reaction to foreign violence. States combining high empathy with high threat perception-such as Poland and the Baltic states during the 2022 invasion-mounted the strongest and most durable responses, providing sanctions, arms transfers, and diplomatic leadership. By contrast, states motivated by only one factor engaged cautiously, while those lacking both largely abstained. The study further shows that empathetic framing, such as appeals to shared democratic identity, can expand coalitions of support, but significant commitments depend on the presence of tangible security stakes. Theoretically, the dissertation offers a parsimonious model that bridges literature on moral solidarity, threat perception, and public opinion. Empirically, it integrates event data, public opinion surveys, and rhetorical analysis to document how narratives reshape perceptions of interest and identity across diverse contexts. The findings carry important normative and policy implications. They suggest that third-party observers can significantly influence the trajectory of international crises when both empathy and threat converge, altering deterrence dynamics and reinforcing global norms. For potential aggressors, the results highlight that violence in an interconnected world is unlikely to remain localized: third-party responses may impose substantial costs that must be factored into strategic calculations.
- 일반주제명
- Political science
- 일반주제명
- Baltic studies
- 키워드
- Bystanders
- 키워드
- Election
- 키워드
- Public opinion
- 키워드
- Spillover
- 키워드
- Foreign violence
- 기타저자
- University of California, Los Angeles Political Science 0699
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-03A.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017359627
■00520260202105148
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798293825813
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32241532
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a320
■1001 ▼aWu, Zhiqian.
■24510▼aThe Spillover of Violence: Its Effect on Third-Party Observers
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bUniversity of California, Los Angeles▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a227 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: A.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Stein, Arthur A.;Min, Eric A.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Los Angeles, 2025.
■520 ▼aThis dissertation develops a two-dimensional typology to explain how third-party observer states respond to foreign aggression. It argues that such responses are shaped by the interaction of two distinct drivers: empathetic identification with the victim and perceived existential threat from the perpetrator. Drawing on cases of China's repression in Hong Kong and Xinjiang (2019) and Russia's interventions in Georgia (2008), Crimea (2014), and Ukraine (2022), the analysis demonstrates that this framework consistently predicts variation in a third-party observer's reaction to foreign violence. States combining high empathy with high threat perception-such as Poland and the Baltic states during the 2022 invasion-mounted the strongest and most durable responses, providing sanctions, arms transfers, and diplomatic leadership. By contrast, states motivated by only one factor engaged cautiously, while those lacking both largely abstained. The study further shows that empathetic framing, such as appeals to shared democratic identity, can expand coalitions of support, but significant commitments depend on the presence of tangible security stakes. Theoretically, the dissertation offers a parsimonious model that bridges literature on moral solidarity, threat perception, and public opinion. Empirically, it integrates event data, public opinion surveys, and rhetorical analysis to document how narratives reshape perceptions of interest and identity across diverse contexts. The findings carry important normative and policy implications. They suggest that third-party observers can significantly influence the trajectory of international crises when both empathy and threat converge, altering deterrence dynamics and reinforcing global norms. For potential aggressors, the results highlight that violence in an interconnected world is unlikely to remain localized: third-party responses may impose substantial costs that must be factored into strategic calculations.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0031.
■650 4▼aPolitical science
■650 4▼aBaltic studies
■653 ▼aBystanders
■653 ▼aElection
■653 ▼aThird-party observers
■653 ▼aPublic opinion
■653 ▼aSpillover
■653 ▼aForeign violence
■690 ▼a0601
■690 ▼a0615
■690 ▼a0361
■71020▼aUniversity of California, Los Angeles▼bPolitical Science 0699.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-03A.
■790 ▼a0031
■791 ▼aPh.D.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17359627▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
