서브메뉴
검색
The Effect of Error Correction Procedures on Skill Acquisition and Maintenance: A Component Analysis of Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC)
The Effect of Error Correction Procedures on Skill Acquisition and Maintenance: A Component Analysis of Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC)
상세정보
- 자료유형
- 학위논문 서양
- 최종처리일시
- 20260202105325
- ISBN
- 9798293873425
- DDC
- 371
- 서명/저자
- The Effect of Error Correction Procedures on Skill Acquisition and Maintenance: A Component Analysis of Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC)
- 발행사항
- [Sl] : Vanderbilt University, 2025
- 발행사항
- Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2025
- 형태사항
- 131 p
- 주기사항
- Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: B.
- 주기사항
- Advisor: Lambert, Joseph M.
- 학위논문주기
- Thesis (Ed.D.Sp.Ed.)--Vanderbilt University, 2025.
- 초록/해제
- 요약While certain error correction procedures are well-supported by existing research, others - such as the Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC) procedure - require further investigation to determine the conditions under which they are most effective. This study conducted a component analysis of PTDC to examine its effects on skill acquisition, maintenance, and participant preference relative to a prompt-transfer only (PT-only) condition. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare the two procedures across three preschool-aged children during discrete trial training (DTT) targeting novel tacts. Dependent variables included percentage of correct responses, various efficiency measures, and maintenance performance. All participants acquired skills in both conditions, with PT-only demonstrating slightly greater instructional efficiency for two participants. However, these differences were minimal and may be even less pronounced under typical instructional conditions that include antecedent instruction. Preference for PTDC may have been influenced by variability inherent in the procedure, suggesting that variability itself could function as a reinforcer and potentially influence preference. Limitations related to target set equivalency are also discussed.
- 일반주제명
- Special education
- 일반주제명
- Behavioral psychology
- 기본자료저록
- Dissertations Abstracts International. 87-03B.
- 전자적 위치 및 접속
- 로그인 후 원문을 볼 수 있습니다.
MARC
008260126s2025 us c eng d■001000017360233
■00520260202105325
■006m o d
■007cr#unu||||||||
■020 ▼a9798293873425
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)AAI32307534
■035 ▼a(MiAaPQ)0242vireo2883Macdonald
■040 ▼aMiAaPQ▼cMiAaPQ
■0820 ▼a371
■1001 ▼aMacdonald, Margaret Jane.
■24510▼aThe Effect of Error Correction Procedures on Skill Acquisition and Maintenance: A Component Analysis of Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC)
■260 ▼a[Sl]▼bVanderbilt University▼c2025
■260 1▼aAnn Arbor▼bProQuest Dissertations & Theses▼c2025
■300 ▼a131 p
■500 ▼aSource: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 87-03, Section: B.
■500 ▼aAdvisor: Lambert, Joseph M.
■5021 ▼aThesis (Ed.D.Sp.Ed.)--Vanderbilt University, 2025.
■520 ▼aWhile certain error correction procedures are well-supported by existing research, others - such as the Prompt-Transfer-Distract-Check (PTDC) procedure - require further investigation to determine the conditions under which they are most effective. This study conducted a component analysis of PTDC to examine its effects on skill acquisition, maintenance, and participant preference relative to a prompt-transfer only (PT-only) condition. An adapted alternating treatments design was used to compare the two procedures across three preschool-aged children during discrete trial training (DTT) targeting novel tacts. Dependent variables included percentage of correct responses, various efficiency measures, and maintenance performance. All participants acquired skills in both conditions, with PT-only demonstrating slightly greater instructional efficiency for two participants. However, these differences were minimal and may be even less pronounced under typical instructional conditions that include antecedent instruction. Preference for PTDC may have been influenced by variability inherent in the procedure, suggesting that variability itself could function as a reinforcer and potentially influence preference. Limitations related to target set equivalency are also discussed.
■590 ▼aSchool code: 0242.
■650 4▼aSpecial education
■650 4▼aBehavioral psychology
■653 ▼aError correction procedures
■653 ▼aDiscrete trial training
■653 ▼aEfficiency measures
■690 ▼a0529
■690 ▼a0384
■71020▼aVanderbilt University.
■7730 ▼tDissertations Abstracts International▼g87-03B.
■790 ▼a0242
■791 ▼aEd.D.Sp.Ed.
■792 ▼a2025
■793 ▼aEnglish
■85640▼uhttp://www.riss.kr/pdu/ddodLink.do?id=T17360233▼nKERIS▼z이 자료의 원문은 한국교육학술정보원에서 제공합니다.
